Search results

There is no 'Godhead.' The term is from Eastern mysticism. You shall have no other gods (especially the trinitarian god) before me. NOTE: Singular pronoun in explicit command. The Father alone is God and is Spirit. His Spirit his Holy. Of course, this is all throughout the Bible. Keep in mind...

No. I'm saying the Gospel of John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the Bible. The word was always God but never Jesus. In order to properly understand John 1:1, you must realize if fulfills Deuteronomy 18:15-18, where God prophesied through Moses that he would put his words into a man among...

Shocking phone call received at 4:20 PM Friday from a friend, going through a divorce. Despite the fact that his wife assaulted him and has a restraining order, the Magistrate ruled that he has to leave the house he's lived in for 23 years so she can move back in. And he has to be out by...

Strawman. The entire Bible is written by monotheists (or unitarian) Hebrews who reject the trinity to this day. On top of that, no one is claiming the word unitarian is in the Bible. However, the doctrine of a one being God is explicitly stated in Scripture, over and over and over again, 1000's...

Are you sure you are not inserting the word "present" to fit your doctrine.

Impressive arrogance, not of the Spirit of God. The obsolete covenant held this truth but, was replaced by the new and everlasting covenant, yes?

I've been told I lack understanding for decades. The truth is that I reject dualism and understand its mystical roots, which contradict logic and therefore, truth.

The word was an attribute of God - but not Jesus. This word of God became flesh - not God. I'm not changing it, just jettisoning the trinitarian foolish take on it. It is foolish because John 20:31 specifically says everything in his Gospel is to prove something other than you are attempting to...

Agreed. That's why I put David on Ignore. A. State a doctrine another church has that you don't agree with and why. B. Mischaracterize another church's doctrine and attack that mischaracterization. B is not the same as A.

No. I’m comparing rationalizations for the trinity to the 3 Stooges.

What a Strawman. No one is denying the flawed concept of the trinity exists. The fact is, the trinity - neither the word, nor the doctrine - is not a part of God’s word. Study well Mark 7:13 and compare it to your 4th century man-made idol. And note that Jesus did not teach the trinity.

The trinity is not in the Bible. The rewrite is proven to be by trinitarians.

I have numerous times in other threads. Just ignore the rest of what I wrote. If I offer the proof of the corruption of the verse, will you alter your belief system?

A man-made criteria, revealing the idolatry of this doctrine for nowhere in Scripture is it stated that Jesus is God or that one must believe that to be saved.

Really? It’s all about believing only the Father is God. I believe in Aristotle. I believe in Napoleon. I believe in Jesus the Anointed (by God). I believe in President Trump. I am a unitarian Christian. This means I believe Jesus’ God is the only God. See John 17:3.

The Bible most certainly does teach adoptionism. We are God’s children, 100% like Jesus, selected by God.

LOL. Who selected Jesus?

I guess you place a lot of significance on this corrupted verse. That is, you are reading your doctrine into dicta. If the verse read, “Go baptize in the name of Moe, Larry and Curly” that does not mean they are a triune God and that are salvation depends on believing it.

Sure but there is not one such verse that declares Christ as God. Even if there were, God the Holy Spirit is not contained either. Just admit that the trinity is not in the Bible.

Only in so much as people confuse Cause and Effect. Salvation is like an inheritance. We are NOW in the will. It's just that the inheritance is not in affect until death. Or in this case, Judgment Day. We are already saved, the effect of being born again. Born again is the cause of salvation...