Search results

Yes, of course! That is what Paul indicated in 1 Corinthians 2:9-16. Why didn't you say that in the first place then? You instead said "The KEY is understanding as "it is written" without adding/taking away/or making scrambled eggs of scripture". Try to work on communicating more clearly.

You are misinterpreting those scriptures. Tell me, will what Jesus said in the following passage one day no longer be true? John 4:19 The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. 20 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where...

He almost always does, so why get bent out of shape just because he didn't do it in that one post? Good grief, Douggg. Lighten up. He did show which chapter and verses the text was from, so you shouldn't make a big deal out of this. biblegateway.com

Nothing but word salads from you. This is a waste of time.

You have shown nothing except that you are willing to interpret one passage of scripture in such a way that contradicts other passages of scripture. I'm not willing to do that. You have no concern that your interpretation of Zechariah 14:16-17 contradicts John 4:19-22 and Hebrews 8-10. That...

Finally, you said something I agree with.

LOL. Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Can you please address what I said in post #10? I refuted your claim about Amils supposedly taking an allegorical approach to scripture. I showed how the foundation of our doctrine is based on clear, literal, straightforward scripture. So, can...

Wrong. He never made such a promise. If you're going to say something like that, then show the scripture to back up your claims. You need to learn to interpret scripture in context. The Lord only promised not to destroy all flesh with a flood again. He did not promise that He would not destroy...

To you, "as it is written" means everything is meant to be taken literally, but, clearly, not all scripture is literal. So, your key to understanding makes no sense since not all scripture is meant to be interpreted literally "as it is written".

No, I did not say that. I don't get the sense that you're even trying to understand what I'm saying. I showed 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 which indicates that Christ's resurrection was the first unto bodily immortality (that is the context of Acts 26:23, also) and then next in order are those who...

Notice how he is afraid to even attempt to answer your questions in post #22. Looks like he's just all hot air and no substance when it comes to his claim that Amil is not taught in scripture.

Is there some reason why you didn't answer WPM's questions he asked in post #22? Were they too difficult for you?

I have no idea what you are talking about here. What does any of this have to do with what I said in my post? Did you not even read my post? Your claim that Amilllennialists use an allegorical approach to interpreting scripture is FALSE and I showed that in my post. Is there anything you don't...

It's easy to make claims like this, but can you back it up and refute Amil? This kind of claim is pointless unless you can actually refute Amil, which I don't believe you can.

Why not just bring up the passage yourself if you need to see the verse numbers? Too hard for you? I read his post, too. It was not hard at all to identify where verses 4 and 7 were in what he posted from Psalm 2:1-12 based on what he quoted from those verses. You're trying to make a mountain...

You're dodging his question. In your doctrine, death is not truly swallowed up in victory at the last trumpet as Paul taught because you even have believers dying after that. So much for death being swallowed up in victory.

LOL. You always imagine yourself as having authority here when you have none. Thanks for the laughs and entertainment that you provide, Douggg.

LOL. He identified the passage as Psalm 2:1-12. Are you too lazy to bring it up yourself if you need to see which verses are which? It's not as if he quoted the verses out of order. Are you aware that there were no chapters and verses in the original manuscripts? Would you have just not bothered...

I didn't say faith is the second birth. Good grief. Faith in what people hear (the word of God) results in being born again. You are not able to debate my beliefs because your own beliefs are from your imagination and not from scripture. Ephesians 1:12 That we should be to the praise of his...

What you're saying is based on doctrinal bias. The text itself (Revelation 11:15-18) indicates no such thing. If you looked at this objectively, when would you think the time of the dead being judged would be? Any objective person would see the time of the dead being judged being described here...