Search results

No, that is not what I'm saying. Are you denying that we have been made free from the wages of sin? Before being saved, we were dead in our sins and were "children of wrath" (Eph 2:3). You don't think we've been made free from what? Of course we have! So, what I'm saying absolutely is NOT false...

LOL. You are unbelievably foolish. Just no discernment about this whatsoever. It is utter idiocy to think that any temple that God Himself would not consider to be His temple is one that scripture would call the temple of God. That is utter moronic lunacy and buffoonery. LOL. Just keep talking...

You know that I already know all of this, don't you? I can't imagine that you haven't seen any of my posts about this same subject or that you don't now what I believe. I'm pretty sure you do. No? Of course I do. After the 62nd week which followed the first 7 weeks. You lost me again. What is...

I'm well aware of that already. I just have never heard of anyone believing He was cut off in the 63rd week. Yes, I am well aware of that. I have done that MANY times and will continue to do so.

I honestly am not trying to do that. Try to remember that you are not the Judge. Is it not your belief that we must not ever sin in order to maintain our salvation? You certainly are coming across that way. If not, then please explain what you do believe. LOL. Okay. I know you're wrong. Who...

And where is this indicated in Daniel 9? Are you making things up to make scripture say what you want it to say again, Douggggggg?

Maybe you shouldn't be so overly sensitive just because someone disagrees with you and calls you out for never backing up your claims with any exegesis of scripture.

He's also ignoring that it says it signals "the time of the dead, that they should be judged" which we know occurs AFTER the thousand years and Satan's little season, as portrayed in Revelation 20:11-15.

Tell us how it's possible that Jesus would tell saved people that He doesn't know them as it shows Him saying to people like the foolish virgins. That is absolutely ridiculous. It's not possible to be saved without Jesus knowing you. You don't even know what salvation is! That is very disturbing.

LOL. No, Revelation 11:14 specifically says the second woe (sixth trumpet) is PAST. That means it's done. And then the third woe (seventh trumpet) follows quickly after that. This is obvious, but you miss even the most obvious things and you constantly twist scripture to make it say what you...

Well, look at that. He is indeed reading my posts. All I want is for you to be wiling to take part in an honest discussion and to be able to handle disagreement without getting all offended and running away. I don't think that's too much to ask. You are here making post after post telling...

I edited my post but you may not have seen it. Are you affiliated with the "Church of God, a Worldwide Association"? As for the following passage... Galatians 3:10 For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do...

No, I had missed that. I see it now. I agree that repentance is necessary for salvation, but some of what I read seems to be a bit legalistic, which is concerning. You understand the putting yourself under the curse of the law is a bad thing, don't you (Gal 3:10-11)? Looks like you are part of...

You are completely lacking in spiritual discernment. This is what I would expect someone to say who undermines Paul's teachings on Bible prophecy like you do (no, I haven't forgotten that). It's a symbolic portrayal of the church witnessing to the world. Romans 11:3 And I will appoint my two...

All I see there is a reference to John 3:16. Is there anything else there that I'm missing? If not, yep, that's how to be saved. Put your faith in Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior (Romans 10:9-10).

Will you please read what I'm actually saying? I didn't claim that He ever did. I'm saying He could if He wanted to with Him being God and all. But, He didn't. And I've said twice now that I see the description of the two witnesses as being symbolic and I don't believe it's talking about them...

Still too afraid to talk to me directly, eh? You believe you don't sin and I'm showing you what it says about people like you. Stop deceiving yourself. But, if you think I'm misrepresenting the following words of God, then you can show how these words should be interpreted. 1 John 1:8 If we...

No, I am not saying that. Read what I actually say. I'm saying He could do that if He wanted to because He is God and can do whatever He wants. What's that to you? But, I'm not saying He actually does that. I am saying that the description of the two witnesses is all symbolic and it's not...

He can if He wants to since He is God. Who are you to tell Him what to do? But, you're missing that the description of the two witnesses and their activities are all symbolic, anyway. It's not talking about them literally killing people, it's talking about the church preaching the gospel which...

What do you mean exactly? He has a plan for everyone's salvation and that plan is for people to repent of their sins and put their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.