Search results

Notice how desperate the trinitarians are, COMPLETELY abandoning the field! This thread is about the Book of Acts. Yabut these other verses (which have been debunked in other threads) ...

Notice how the text does not state Jesus created all things?

The proof is the absence of any such statement in Scripture. Said differently, there is no proof of any trinitarian claim.

Notice how John 1:1 does NOT say God became flesh?

Agreed. He is just not the LORD God, who selected the man Jesus to be our Savior and Master (lord).

What a desperate attempt to equate the LORD with my Lord. Maybe back then, people were used to being subjects and servants, it not slaves, to a master they owed loyalty to. Perhaps there is a modern day bias against calling anyone lord except the LORD. In any event. LORD. Lord. Not equal.

While true, there is no REASON to abandon the field of evidence to unbelievers. :)

The dualist pernicious statement is that he is fully man and fully God, a contradiction if there ever was one. The whole lesson of Original Sin is that man is NOT God; they are mutually exclusive terms. Fully IN is not synonymous with Fully OUT.

Only trinitarian corrupted translations suppose that, like the KJV. Others properly say he merely called out to the Lord Jesus - who is NOT God. The ESV prides itself on being the most literal translation in English, And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.”

No. Jesus is a lord but not of the Old Testament. The desperate arguments and assertions of trinitarians just get more outlandish!

Not really an answer to my question. When Jesus was on Earth he told us to pray to a single being in heaven. That means nothing, in practice?

If this is true, why did Jesus tell us to pray to a being in heaven ONLY?

I am serious. The trinity is not n the Bible - not the word and not the doctrine. Attempts to back into it as a False Alternative will fail. Jesus is not any kind of God. The Book of Acts says God selected this man (Jesus) but that has no impact on your theology.

How do you know this? Jesus did and the Bible says he is a man.

It totally fits. John 14:26 has a “you” and and “I.” This refers to 2 beings. Just because the verse references more than 2 does not make them all one being.

The same as all men do. Like all men. See above. Obviously, a mistake trinitarian make is to suppose any information we have about this chosen man is different from other men. I’ve been told the Bible does not say anything about re-incarnation. Well, except for Jesus, there might be some...

I've neglected this thread for some time, wanting to turn our attention to evidence reliance on the Bible, which there is much. From today's Devotional Reading, this Golden Nugget. Paul is not impressed by human eloquence but is very sensitive to the power of the Spirit. 19 But I am coming to...

This reveals the trinitarian delusion is so strong, they CANNOT acknowledge how normal application of DEFINITION, LOGIC and LANGUAGE USAGE is not their friend. Singular pronouns do not support multiple beings as part of God and his nature.

Circular Reasoning - not found in the text from the OP.

It's NOT critical at all since all first born children are only begotten. In any event, begotten is synonymous with created. Thanks for bringing this point up. :)