Search results

No. The KJV has many errors. I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Make a blessed day.

Don't you realize how ridiculous what you are saying is? In light of John 20:31, that all that John wrote is to prove Jesus is not God incarnate but the Messiah and John 17:22, we also are one with God. It does not make us God. The expression simply means 'on the same page' and is still used today.

Explained many times. Search for my posts referencing Deuteronomy 18:15-18.

Absolutely. No kind of god is a false God. Why do you disregard Jesus saying his Father is the only true God?

Exegesis. Of course, anyone can impose a take using vague verses to ‘support’ whatever you want. As my signature shows, a way you know you are wrong is the Hebrews, from which Genesis comes are monotheists and reject the trinity to this day. So, it is odd, indeed, to take religious text used...

No. The 2 great classes of translations are THOUGHT and LITERAL. In reality, all are both to some extent. I prefer thought translations for readability. I learned this week that the grammar is different in Japanese. So, while we might say “I gave it to you” SUBJECT-VERB-OBJECT, the Japanese...

HINT: Scripture tells us not to argue debatable things. It’s high time that you welcome all people weak in the faith without debating and disputing their opinions ... In light of this, we must resolve never to judge others and never to place an obstacle or impediment in their paths that could...

Not who. WHAT became flesh. The word of God is a WHAT not a WHO. Every prophet is the word of God that became flesh, spoken by a flesh and bone human being. This is in contrast to people being terrified upon hearing directly from God. See Deuteronomy 18:15-18.

Rationalize it all you want, my friend.

Friend, Jesus died. That is how you know he is not God. Only the Father is God. Jesus said it, which is good enough for me. Jesus is sent by the one true God Father ... because You have given Me total authority over humanity. I have come bearing the plentiful gifts of God; and all who receive...

Right. Every prophet is the word of God becoming flesh. It does not mean that God became flesh. Just ignore 20:31 which destroys all trinitarian efforts to use anything in his Gospel to support trinitarianism.

This is the fallacy trinitarians invoke, Appeal to Diversion. I reference how 1 Cor 1:3 parses God (who alone is the Father) with Jesus as a matter of logic, definition and language usage. You just ignore that. Then aim to distract the conversation with other verses you hope supports your...

I see. “Our” image is obviously plural - and no possible other explanation is possible, even among the monotheist Hebrews from which it comes - but so is “I.” Doesn’t the Bible condemn calling people fools? Or does that only apply to non-trinitarians?

You do realize Jesus is not even mentioned in John 1:1, right? And John told us his entire Gospel was to prove Jesus was not God incarnate but the Messiah. This means trinitarians who use 1:1 as evidence of their doctrine are going against St John.

I’ve been thinking a lot about this. If the Spirit of God tells you to go West and me to go East, it seems the one who is wrong is the one who says the word of God does not change.

LOL. Seems the singular pronoun “I” means plural to you.

The Genesis quote is dicta compared to the 1C, you shall have no other god's before me.

Unitarianism pre-dates trinitarianism by millennia. Unitarianism or monotheism is what everyone who wrote the Bible believed. This explains why the trinity - the word and the doctrine - is not in Scripture. This explains why all the Epistles differentiate God (who alone is the Father) from Jesus...

No. You may not be playing my game but you are playing a game. You asked a 2 part question. Just because I did not originally use the words “clarify the scope of your question” does not mean that is what I'm saying is a pre-requisite for me to answer your question(s). Make a blessed day.