Search results

,,

Read verse 22 Do you have another way of asking God than through prayer? And please don't swear. You are taking His name in vain.

We HAVE a Savior. His name is Jesus.

I already did. #201

No it isn't. The liberal believes they will always be struggling with sin, but it will be covered by the blood of Jesus while they keep sinning.

Well said.

It is actually words given definitions that could lead those who are liberal to error.

1 John 3:18-24 18 My little children, let us not love in word or in tongue, but in deed and in truth. 19 And by this we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before Him. ... 21 Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence toward God. 22 And whatever we ask...

Maybe not all the way to "holy," but they become righteous immediately when empowered with the baptism of the Holy Spirit. You may be believing the teaching that the process of our becoming holy is called "sanctification" like E used. That is an error in semantics. We are already sanctified as...

You wanted wording "exactly," I asked if a Scripture that uses the word "assure" instead would be okay for your skeptical mind.

It uses the word "assure;" will that do for your skeptical mind? And it is my belief according to the scriptures, that God only answers, "yes." Anything out of His will He doesn't even listen to, so we only think He sometimes says no, but it is all on us, not Him. By the way, you are as bad...

Why, because I actually believe what the Scriptures say? This describes you: 14 But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.

Not necessarily.

I believe it applies to praying for something for ourselves, that we need to wait on the Lord. And just because you don't wait on the Lord out of not knowing that you should doesn't mean you are not saved. This is more for assurance that you are saved. So if your prayers are answered, you have...

When 1 Corinthians says NO MAN, that means foreigners too. The understanding was supernatural. The Holy Spirit fell on them and all the gifts fell too

They all spoke Hebrew and their native language, so each of those of other nations could still converse with one another. I don't know why you didn't think of that... Again, "every man (singular) heard them (plural, like a choir) And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were...

"every man (singular) heard them (plural)" This is where most people get hung up; they are not reading what is written, but are interpreting what is written by what they believe. Granted, it is not as clear as it could be, but the speaking in tongues sounded like a choir (them) to each man...

Don't you know that to me Chinese sounds like gibberish nonsense. So does Russian and African dialects. Why, because it doesn't sound like a language to me. I can't understand it. And most of them can't understand me. But God says, NO MAN can understand tongues. That is why the supernatural gift...

It's funny that some on the forum believe Paul was over 1300 years old.

Satan always counterfeits the real thing so fools will scoff at the real thing and not be benefited. Besides Christian 'speaking in tongues' are languages created by God, not chirping and muttering. Just because we don't understand the language doesn't mean that God doesn't. I don't understand...