Search results

The game is grasping how to apply Definition Logic Language Usage I can understand why you don't want to 'play' as these foundations of grasping things don't aid your doctrine but rather exploit it as the inherent contradiction it is, like square circles. Just one example. There are numerous...

??? Jesus was and is a man. What kind of implied premise is there in this question?

You are desperate. There is simply no passage in Scripture that explicitly teaches the trinity or that Jesus is God. On top of this, Scripture says repeatedly that Jesus was a man. This should be recognized as different than this man being in the form of something else. Let me put this in a...

No, curtis. The question does not require an explanation but a simple, Yes or No. I imagine your jumping right to 'explanation' is the same way of thinking that allows your brain to side step the many passages that state Jesus is sitting or standing at the right hand of God, in his unitarian...

Thank God the Founding Father's of America recognized violating our rights is sufficient reason to rebel against encroachment on our God given gifts.

Words are what's not who's. Trinitarians have to confuse basic Definition. Logic. Language Usage. to support their doctrine. If you really want to study the Greek, compare John 1:1 what to the what word is hard in John 6:60. Beings are who. Words are what.

More proof that Jesus is NOT God. If I have a ceramic doll in the form of a dolphin, one thing you know is the ceramic doll is NOT a dolphin. The same with the man Jesus being in the form of that which he is not; namely God.

That God can do all things does not mean he does all things. One thing he does not do is violate his own unitarian nature. That he alone is God is stated over 10,000 times in Scripture.

Desperate interpretation. The word of God was made flesh - not God made incarnate. The words of God were put in a man as prophesied in Deuteronomy 18:15-18. We know this because beings are not words.

This quote might get us back on track. The Apostles spoke of Judgment Day being imminent, soon, last hours, etc. If it were up to me, it would already be here. Then again, I am not as merciful and grace-filled as our Lord.

Trinitarian rejectors is what we are. The Gospel of John is about how God resurrected his anointed one. This is why Jesus, the resurrected Jesus, was talking about going to his God in 20:17. God. Father. LORD. Synonyms. Jesus. Son of God. Anointed by God. Synonyms. Father’s create sons. The...

The conversation was about the words of John.

Sadly, trinitarians equate or even supersede their idol with being a Jesus follower.

Your references do not say Jesus is the Father. My guess is that you are so indoctrinated that you do not realize it. Mark 1:1 explains the ministry of Jesus is about the Son of God. This means he is not God.

God, in his unitarian nature, gave the resurrected Christ a revelation in 1:1. That means nothing to you. I’m OK with the other titles going to God’s Anointed, King of kings and Lord of lords.” lowercase lord. Nowhere is Jesus ever referred to as the Father (which would be God incarnate) or...

The Father alone.

So says you. Jesus is God’s Anointed not God. I only deny trinitarianism not the Father and the Son.

Scripture says no such thing - but we know trinitarians wish it did.

Tri is 3, not one. And the trinity is not in the Bible, not the word, not the idea. Apologists have to splice together numerous bits of verses here and there to 'support' the doctrine that is not there. There is no verse in 66 books where it is mentioned. It is such an important doctrine, it is...

Kind of. The rock is the confession, that the promise of God is fulfilled in anointing Jesus as God's suffering servant to pay a ransom for many.