Search results

I totally accept God’s Word, which happens to obliterate trinitarianism at every turn.

Bingo. And ‘his people’ have also changed, ie, some overlap. A fair interpretation of Scripture is that God delegated the responsibility of husbandry to his Son.

It does NOT logically follow for the reasons explained ad nauseum.

I think it is because it is such a badly worded question, most are abstaining.

Your PERVERSION OF EQUALITY is so complete you do not realize that overlap is irrelevant to different, to not being equal. My wife and I both went to 1st grade. That overlap in our education does not make us the same being. There is no dilemma. An old covenant was made obsolete by the new...

True but totally irrelevant to the price of tea in China.

Your actual argument has no credibility for it falsely asserts 2 couples cannot be married and not all be different beings.

His entire position is ridiculous. The entire claim of RCC authority is absurd. The very idea that almighty God would rely on the pitiful power of a man and his successors to carry out his plain for humanity's salvation rather than his own omnipotent power is shocking to all reason. It really...

Everything. Wearing a bullet proof vest IN THE MOMENT OF TRUTH has everything to do with eternal life. Reality works a certain way. Water boils at 100C and freezes at 0C (@ STP). These are present tense conditions. Just because water previously was frozen does not mean it cannot boil. The same...

Jesus standing in for God, being our lone mediator to God is what the Good News is. Not sure why you think this profoundly proves Jesus is God. See Deuteronomy 18:15-18. God selected this man because God is a consuming fire. So, the man Jesus insulates is from that. Regarding ‘God’s people;’...

Ridiculous abuse of language. To answer your question , you have to concede what it takes - PRESENT TENSE - to be born again. To deny time dependency is to abdicate the field of battle of OSAS.

Such a desperate claim of victory. I addressed this twice before. In your last post, you introduced more verses than I had time Friday night to research. Let me type this slowly so you might understand better... different people can get married and remarried. Not sure why you think this line...

Game. Set. Match. Indeed! It’s not that they are never wrong but the book is about circles, not squares or square circles.

No time. Because you speak in negation and paraphrase. What word, in your estimation, means not or anti-trinitarian? HINT: Jews reject the trinity and refer to their belief in the nature of God as monotheism.

It sure does say God cannot become man in 2 ways: God does not change = He does not become anything. God is spirit, not flesh.

Oy vey. You are lost. Jews are trinitarian now? It’s like you have no epistemological foundation - beyond twisting everything to support an inherently contradictory idea.

So many indoctrinated takes on Scripture. Jn 10:16 refers to saints. For some bizarre reason, you are equating it with members of the Roman denomination.

No. Rather science provides evidence of God.

Friend, I just explained this. A bullet proof vest means a bullet proof vest. Are you going to ignore my question about the need to be wearing the vest in the moment of truth?

I’m not sure what prophecy you are referencing. However, the foundation of proper Biblical understanding is that the entire Bible is written by monotheist Jews, which Jesus was one, who reject the trinity to this day. Of course, there are many prophecies in the Bible but none are about God...