Search results

The trinity is not in the Bible. You ignore the entirety of the unitarian Bible to project your trinitarian doctrine and talk AS IF there is a verse like this: The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & HS - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved. But there is...

You wish that is what Hebrews 1:8 said! o' God means of God. Hebrews 1:8 merely quotes Psalms. Angles are of God. Doesn't make them God. What part of the 1C do you not get?

The rationalizations mount. Specifically, rationalizing inferences over explicit text. Jesus, himself, send he knew less and was not as great as God, was sent by God, only says what God tells him to say, prayed to God, raised from the dead by God and after being resurrected, the 1st words out of...

Wrong. I did refute your claims. You are again projecting. And are again denying Jesus Himself explicitly said he was going to his God in John 20:17.

It is you who has a remarkable bias, imposing your trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text. Jesus Himself said he was going to his God in John 20:17. That means nothing to you?!

There are many Christian administrators. They just don’t flow through Rome.

Resorting to lying now? Jesus is not even mentioned in the verse. The desperation is amazing. Explicit is 1 Corinthians 11:3 But there is one thing I want you to know: The head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. Who is the head of Christ? God, in...

According to the VOICE translation, which I like because it makes this explicit, the Eternal, Commander of heavenly armies, the LORD God almighty - not his Son.

No but. Request denied. Jesus alone is our sole mediator to God. Obviously, I reject RCC claims to authority over their fellow man.

In fact, most doctrines are not explicit teachings in the Bible. This is why most denominations rely on 'supporting' verses for the pre-conceived doctrine. I started an entire thread differentiating 'support' from 'explicit teachings.' As one EOC said, one can 'support' anything using the Bible...

Jesus is the head of the Church per 1 Co 11:3. It disgusts me how traditional churches seek spiritual power & authority over others. Traditional dogma is oppressive.

The trinity is not in the Bible. FACT.

Right. Not with the successors. Reading into Scripture what is not there gets RCC in trouble.

Are you aware that you cannot answer a question with a question? I am not saying Scripture is wrong but your taking exclamatory statements of an individual in the story as being narration. A good example is when Jesus says he’ll rebuild the temple in 3 days. The narration clarifies. That...

I realize this is definitive to you. However, why are you disregarding the Jews who wanted to stone Jesus because he was a man and not God? It seems you are picking and choosing which verses to go by. To me, nothing is more definitive than Paul saying 'For us, there is one God, the Father,' and...

No Bible says Jesus is God. You do like to confuse exclamations with declaratory sentences. John said, "Behold, the Lamb of God," which means Jesus is the lamb, not God. Jesus said he was sent by God, which means he is not God. Paul said 'For us, there is one God, the Father.' Jesus is not the...

OMG! If you want to deny the prophet Isaiah said these words and wrote these words on Adonai's behalf, it would not surprise me. Point is, when Jesus said these words, just like when Isaiah said them, he was speaking for God - as all prophets do. You want to apply the words of God to a man of...

But the Jews said he was not God. Odd that you take as narration what is exclamation. People say 'my God' even today as an exclamation not a declarative statement of fact. Jesus said he was not God over and over and over again. This means nothing to you?!

Yea, as we are one. John 17:22. Does not make the man Jesus God any more than us.

I don't know about your alternatives but trinity is approved heresy?