Search results

I've posted this numerous times. Doubt trinitarians watch it. (2601) John's Prologue - Part 1 - YouTube

Yea, in favor of Black people. See college admission standards.

I like the NLT also, along with CEV & VOICE and sometimes ESV. No one translation always impacts me the most. If you read through Why The Apostles Repeatedly Disobeyed the Risen Lord you'll see a bizarre rationalization that when the Apostles only baptized in no name or the name of Jesus, it...

It's Cultural Marxism, advancing communism along identity politics. It has to invent an oppressor group and and oppressed group. Black/White & Men/Women are but 2 'intersectionalities.'

Cannot grasp figurative language, huh? The literal name of the son of God is not Immanuel. Indeed, God is with us, through the man Jesus. There is one God and one Mediator who can reconcile God and humanity—the man Christ Jesus. 1 Timothy 2:5

Hmmm. Certainly the NSRV translates the verses that way. You seem to disregard the 'from the LORD' part of the verses, even in your preferred NKJV, is that accurate? Regarding the limits of God being good; I imagine people on the receiving end of God's wrath and justice equate it with evil...

I've been told this for decades. Trinitarians confuse <not understanding> with <rejecting as invalid>, e.g., flat Earth.

If I did, I'd be the biggest hypocrite in the world! I love fiction involving super powers and magic. As a kid, I loved Superman. Then Star Wars came out with 'the Force.' Green Lantern, Harry Potter & Marvel Comics all obsess over magic stones. Human powers are relegated to not super powers...

The trinity is nonsense (like square circles), inherently contradictory, goes against Scripture, logic, definition and language usage. Well, we are many things. You stop counting at a 1 = 3 convenience. 1 = 1; 1 <> 3. A is A. Apples are not <Apples and Oranges>. There is nothing hard here.

Hmmm. In the book When Jesus Became God, the author Rubenstein details how politically motivated even compiling Scripture was. For instance, there is very credible evidence that Matthew 28:19 was not in the original manuscripts but was a 4th century trinitarian corruption. Have you ever looked...

I agree with that. Don't you see though that in Daniel, he was talking about himself but in 1 Samuel, it is a proper noun, a Spirit and most significantly, from the LORD? Another words, it is one thing for Saul to despair, for his spirit to be penitent for disobeying God. It is another thing for...

Scripture does fit together seamlessly - once you jettison the trinity, stop imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text.

LOL That's what everyone does.

The thread is about proof. Since there is no proof - and apologists must rely on mysticism - you all should just admit there is no Scriptural proof. I've repeatedly pointed out the most significant proof is what is absent from 66 books; the most significant proof that Jesus is not God is that...

One does not have to be God to be guilty of blasphemy.

The church that protects me from being attacked instead of the argument. Although what you wrote is not proper English, I think we are saying the same thing; that John 17:3 shows Jesus stating that his Father is the ONLY true God. all who receive Me will experience everlasting life, a new...

Hidden In Him, thank you for your thoughtful post. So, you are parsing <The Spirit of the LORD> from a <spirit of depression>; a being with an attitude or mental state? I do like that but both the NSRV and NKJV emphasize from the LORD. How do you reconcile that? There are many other verses in...

There is a lot of this in the Bible. Person X does things through Person or Thing Y. For instance, God humbled Pharaoh indirectly via the 10 Plaques. Your mother does things through you. In another thread, 2 poster's took a deep dive in who does things: God or the angels or prophets. Talking...

Not at all. The good news is not that God was resurrected from the dead. The good news is that God raised a man from the dead and that is the inheritance of us all! Again, see Acts 17:31. What does this verse mean to you?

Neither did Jesus, who Scripture tells us over and over is a man.