Search results

Then I guess no one Who died pre Mark 16 is saved (Rolling eyes)

I see a few in here buy into the fake news..sad

Defund cops Destroy inner cities Praise criminals while attacking law abiding citizens Blame everyone else when they get caught doing something wrong just a few I have witnessed the past few months

Never mind I give up trying to explain it

That’s ridiculous, if the words mean different how can one word be adequate? Especially when used in the same few verses

Yep and he used two words in the same context you keep ignoring my question can agape and phileo ever mean the same?

He is talking about the ability to perform miracles, It was not only given to peter, not even only to apostles,

So you place men equal,with Jesus? That’s where the first problem lies paul and peter and all apostles were men, who were not perfect, who had self will who still Sinned, and even had to call each other out because they were not perfect. Christ is perfect. He is the one who holds it all...

Show me a bible that seperates the different types of love in John 21, let’s start there

Can they ever mean the same ? Context did not change in the passage why two words? Why could peter not say he agaped him

Solid translation I know if a few. I use them all but that’s not what you said you said Pure. Ie perfect. Backtracking now?

Can you not answer my questions? Do they mean the same? Since they birth were translated with the same English word (love)

Oh it endures, it endures in many English texts, you just want to make an idle out of one text

Do agape and phileo mean the exact same thing? Are they equivalent words which can be used interchangeably because they are prickly equal with one another?

For THEIR local church THE church is built on Christ Jesus told peter, I now call you Petros (small stone or pebble) and on this Petra (large stone or boulder) I will build my church the rock the church was built on was not petro (little peter) but Petra, which was christ the son of the...

I already showed you how Jesus conversation with peter is not correct in any English version you look at. if it were to be truely interpreted. It would show how Jesus asked peter if he agape him, and Peters replay that he phileo him, and Jesus asked again, do you agape me, and peter again...

No, it said it is built on CHrist, Peter and the apostle are the foundation stones. The cornerstone (Christ is however, what any building is built on, without it, the building is weak and has no real foundation.

That’s what I thought when I read it, it sounded christian

It’s not the king James you do realize back in Jesus day they had scrolls not bibles correct? I believe they also used the Septuagint a lot.

Thank you I did not know this