Search results

There are no prophecies that are of a specified duration that have any gaps in them. Of course, any prophecies that are not of a specified duration can have gaps in them because they just talk about things that will happen without saying everything prophesied has to happen within a certain...

How so? It does not say how long after the end of the 69th week that the Messiah would be cut off. So, why not 3.5 years after? Nothing in the text prevents that from being the case. This is false. The word itself does not imply one way or another how long after. It can be used to refer to...

I don't know what you're trying to say here. I assume you are referring to Jesus's parable in Matthew 22:1-14? The guests are not guests of the bride, they are guests of the king. And do you understand that it's not talking about an actual bride and actual wedding? It's a parable relating to...

Do you not believe in the existence of angels? Revelation 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, How do you interpret this verse? You see this as a battle between human messengers in heaven?

You fail to address any of my points. What a waste of time. Can you acknowledge that Gentile believers are among the elect now along with Israelite believers? There is no such thing as "the Gentile Church". The church is made up of both Jew and Gentile believers and there is only one church...

I hope the same for you. I didn't respond to anything else you said because I would have just ended up repeating what I had said in the post you were responding to. You think Paul's focus was on the nation of Israel and I think it was on individual faith (or the lack thereof). So be it.

You misunderstood what I was saying, which is no surprise. That text is saying 69 weeks would pass and that would lead to Messiah the Prince. What I'm saying is that it doesn't specify what "unto the Messiah the Prince" means exactly. Obviously, there is no consensus about what that phrase means.

So, why didn't Peter say we are looking forward to the holy land instead? Was he just getting ahead of himself? Or did he have a different idea of what "the holy land" would consist of?

LOL. Look at Davy making a fool of himself. Show me where it "declares Messiah being "cut off" with the "threescore and two" weeks". What translation are you using, the Antichrist Translation? Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the...

What are you even saying here? Do you have any idea? Are you unable to communicate clearly? The text indicates that He would be cut off some time AFTER the first 69 weeks ended. Is there some reason why you are missing something so obvious? LOL. You are something else. Are you for real? Or just...

Talk about distorting scripture. It absolutely does NOT say He would be cut off at the end of the 69th week. Why are you being so dishonest? Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy...

You believe that Christ's death fulfilled at least one of the six things listed in Daniel 9:24 that were to be fulfilled within the 70 weeks, right? Such as making reconciliation for iniquity? I think you said before that you believed Jesus fulfilled that with His death. With that in mind, how...

Why does it have to be one or the other instead of both? What comes after 69? Obviously, 70. Does the text tell us how long after the 69th week that the Messiah would be cut off? No, it does not. Why do you act as if it does?

It's SILLY to compare a prophecy without a set duration to Daniel 9:24-27 which did have a set duration as evidence that there can be a gap within a prophecy with a set duration. But, go ahead and continue making your SILLY argument if you insist.

Exactly. How anyone can conclude that His death doesn't fall anywhere within the 70 weeks is beyond me. Especially anyone who believes that His death has something to do with fulfilling at least one of the six things listed in Daniel 9:24. If His death is a part of fulfilling at least part of...

I need to stop you here. When the prophecy says "unto Messiah the Prince" it's not saying unto the Messiah's death. But, you're acting as if it says that. No, it says the Messiah would be cut off some time AFTER the 69th week has ended. And it doesn't say how long after. So, you can't use the...

You don't understand what I say, that's for sure. You are misrepresenting my view. When I said "I will build my church..." that was obviously before His death and resurrection. What I have been saying is that the OT saints were added to His church upon His death and resurrection. So, I have not...

It seems that you are not reading the text carefully. Paul specifically said "Did God reject his people? By no means!". And you are saying He did. And the evidence Paul used to prove that He didn't was that there was a remnant of believers at that time. God's people are believers, Randy. Why do...

He's not really their king. He is the king of the other fallen angels, though. That's why scripture refers to "his angels" (Matthew 25:41, Rev 12:9). I do agree that Abaddon is Satan, though.

If you ever grow up then please get back to me and we can discuss these things like adults. Until then...goodbye.