Search results

I am not pitting one verse against another I have proved they are not in the same context so are not related Has nothing to do with pitting one against another, it is putting them both inn context. I guess that is too hard for you to understand

or you could try reading what they said 3 possibilities 1. Without begging or end 2. without beginning 3. without end John 3: 16 would only fit using the 3rd possibility as since we have a beginning, the first two possibilities do not pertain to us.

no appology necessary but thank you I have many more lexicons and they all say the same, which would you like to see. Are they all decieved?

No they did not. You must think you know everything You used the word AEON.. Thats NOT the word used in John 3: 16, "eternal life" o believe what you want, if your afraid to look it up. thats on you

Wrong If it could be lost. ITS NOT ETERNAL. ITS CONDITIONAL You can have your conditional life.. I will wish you well

Like I said, believe what you want You want to earn your salvation feel free But do not tell me your not working for your salvation.

lol

I do not have a link, I have logos bible siftware. which includes many lexicons, dictionaries commentaires and forms of resources. I took it from there If you want to look it up feel free Greek-english lexicon of the new testament Joseph Henry Thayer you can find it according to my layout on...

Nope No confusion The confusion comes from you taking two different events and trying to force them to be the same when nothing in either passage would support this view.. As I showed..

Oh you think you are going to "hose me" lololol Ok, feel free. I will get the popcorn

Nope I did not take it from that source, I took it from another source.. People think strongs is the end all. Strongs gives you a defenition of the root word and all possibilities. the source I used gave a definition of the word as written,

One thing is for sure. You claim you know what a word means, and a defenition of the word is given to you you did not like. So you attack the one who gave it as if it is there fault You are not being honest my friend, So I beliee I will cut off communications. I can not converse with someone...

Its not the same word In jon 2 the word is eis ton aiona 1 John 3: 16 the word is aionion... The suffix ion is what gives it its eternal meaning, without end, in fact here is the defenition of the word used in 1 John taken from the same source I used for John 3: 16 (eternal) αἰών, -ῶνος...

I will Here is the truth αἰώνιος, -ον, and (in 2 Th. 2:16; Heb. 9:12; Num. 25:13; Plat. Tim. p. 38 b. [see below]; Diod. i. 1; [cf. WH. App. p. 157; W. 69 (67); B. 26 (23)]) -ος, -α, -ον, (αἰών); 1. without beginning or end, that which always has been and always will be: θεός, Ro. 16:26, (ὁ...

Well you gave a defenition, I gave the true defenition. What you do with it is up to you

Yet I jut posted the fact, By posing the defenition of what the word translated eternal means Interesting you cut that defenition which proved my point out of your comment. Sly

he is not warning believers He is warning make believers (people who have not come tro truth faith. Not everyone is saved because they believe Jesus died. It takes true saving faith. I have said this to you numberous times Why do you think I still believe different?

Been here done this, I proved this wrong why would you want to go back to this argument αἰώνιος, -ον, and (in 2 Th. 2:16; Heb. 9:12; Num. 25:13; Plat. Tim. p. 38 b. [see below]; Diod. i. 1; [cf. WH. App. p. 157; W. 69 (67); B. 26 (23)]) -ος, -α, -ον, (αἰών); 1. without beginning or end, that...

I am not trying to put others right, I am just trying to share with them what I see. so we can have a discussion, But for some people we can not do that. You have been trying to put me right for years now.. Again, You need to look in the mirror. because again, you are not practicing what you...

The bible teaches eternal life. It teaches we are sealed in Christ. It teaches that those who are born again are his children and will never be lost It does not teach the works based gospel you are trying to teach we will have to agree to disagree