Search results

LOL. Show me where you discussed the scriptures I used to back up my view of Daniel 9:24. Oh, wait, you didn't. Stop being a hypocrite.

But, you won't tell me how you interpret Romans 9:6-8? Saying it says what it says is meaningless. That doesn't tell me how you understand it. If you understood Romans 9:6-8 then you would know. Paul contrasted two Israels there. What some of us call Spiritual Israel (or the Israel of God - Gal...

I have been discussing all kinds of scripture, so give me a break. I am going far above and beyond what almost anyone else would be willing to do when it comes to replying to your nonsense. Those scriptures are not saying that literally all Israelites will repent. How could that possibly happen...

Who said I didn't understand that? Not me. But, I was simply explaining to you in what sense I considered myself to be an Israelite. You ridiculously acted as if I am claiming to be a natural Israelite, which I'm not. And you noticeably didn't even bother attempting to tell me how you interpret...

Why does this have to be so complicated? The fact that your view is so convoluted says a lot about what you believe. The truth isn't nearly so convoluted. But, you believe that sin will still occur after Jesus returns, right? So, how can you conclude that making an end of sins has anything to...

I don't claim to be a natural Israelite (a physical descendant of the nation of Israel). I claim to be a Spiritual Israelite. Do you not know the difference? How do you interpret this passage: Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are...

You might be shocked by this, but I agree with you. But, of course, I interpret Romans 11:25-27 and Isaiah 59:20-21 very differently than you do. Romans 11:26-27 is not a prophecy about the future as many imagine, but rather is an explanation of the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecy from...

I don't get it at all when people try to act as if Luke 21:20-24a and Matthew 24:15-21 are not parallel passages even though they so clearly are. They have obvious similarities. The differences are only because of the different audiences for each. Luke was writing to Gentiles and Matthew was...

Why do you need me to bring it into the picture? Just tell me how exactly you think the making an end of sins will be fulfilled, for example. Just start with one of the six things listed in Daniel 9:24 if that makes it easier.

You ignore the context. He was speaking of no flesh in Judea, not in the world. That's why He said those in Judea need to flee into the mountains. He didn't say everyone in the world needed to flee. I don't mind talking that way, obviously. But, I don't do nonsensical things like you such as...

Are you kidding me here? Are you even thinking at all about what you're saying? If they can end their own transgressions then they wouldn't need Jesus! Think! Everyone needs Jesus! Everyone sins and needs to repent and believe in Jesus so that their sins can be forgiven. No one can make an end...

I showed you what it's about in my post. Your didn't respond specifically to anything I said. That's quite telling. How can you think I don't want to know what Daniel 9:24 is about when I created a long post showing exactly what it's about? Your lack of even attempting to refute anything I said...

Matthew 24 records Jesus as saying that the temple buildings standing at that time would be destroyed. And it records the disciples' question about that. But, somehow, it doesn't record His answer to that question? I can't take that seriously.

What? No, the city and the sanctuary were destroyed by the Roman armies long ago. No, He was asked two questions. His coming and the end of the age go hand in hand. What about the other question, though? Obviously, the disciples would want more details about the temple buildings being destroyed...

I completely disagree. You are not seeing the context there. Paul was not talking about something that was happening at that time when he said we will judge angels. Notice he contrasted that with judging "things that pertain to this life". So, judging the angels/messengers does not pertain to...

You have such low expectations. I believe God has far better things in store for us than you realize. I honestly am completely baffled at how you are looking at all of this. Was Jesus's resurrected body subject to the laws of gravity and nature in the same way our bodies are now? Apparently not...

Is there some reason why you think there is a problem with thinking our bodies after we're changed will have far greater capabilities than they do now? You are missing the context of what Paul said. Let's take a look at it. This is what Paul said regarding the natural body people have now. 1...

Making reconciliation for iniquity and bringing in everlasting righteousness is not for Christians? Have you never read the New Testament? Is your religion Judaism?

They cannot fulfill this. Only Jesus can and He did by dying on the cross for their transgressions. Not all of them have. It has nothing to do with the entire nation not sinning. Everyone sins. Only Jesus could fulfill this prophecy. He made an end of sins by way of His death and resurrection...

You said NOTHING about Daniel 9:24 in that post. No, one thing we know is that you have no idea of what Daniel 9:24 is about. Of course those things have all occurred. Did Jesus not make an end of sins by taking away our sins? 1 John 3:5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our...