Search results

John and several Mary’s were with him.

Wrong. It’s such a desperate trinitarian reach to suppose this figurative verse makes this statement. Beings and people are not words. HINT: The Word is the Word of God, not Jesus.

Wrong! We are not people of the book! All that matters is having a right relationship with God and others. We are NOT saved by having correct doctrine but humbly accepting our need for a Savior and trusting the Son of God. This is just as true for all those who have wrong doctrines and test...

No. Jesus did not compromise but patiently taught the ignorant masses. I am not advocating compromise. I am advocating tact when you know there is disagreement. Not vicious in-fighting like we sometimes see here.

No. It’s a diversion to the passage I quoted. For obvious reasons, you want to change the subject - to the importance of being saved. No one is disputing this. This thread is about OSAS and Matthew 7:21 ties work as responsibility to calling Jesus your Lord. Period. Quoting other verses are...

Well, the starting point is not to assume anyone who disagrees with you is either the devil, possessed by a demon or deliberately twisting things. Instead, assume that any differences in doctrinal understanding is sincere and one of you is less spiritually mature. They are on the right path...

The driver of prolific Protestant denominating. Does the Bible say anything about unity, peace and patience with those of differing opinions? Rom 14:1, 13; Jam 4:11-12

I must have missed that. Not relevant to the issue at hand. Why did Jesus reject those who did works in his name? And telling them flat out. HE NEVER KNEW THEM Your question is a distraction from the issue.

Thomas Jefferson said when it comes to principles stand like the rock when it comes to fashion flow like the river. Another quip is to get along you have to go along. If you don’t compromise, you won’t get along with people. Take Christians of other denominations, for instance. The core...

Not an answer to why you ignore Matthew 7:21.

Yea right! It is not a Scriptural thing. It IS a 4th century human construct thing.

If this were true the resurrected Jesus would not be talking about his God in John 20:17 and Revelations 3. There is only one God and it is Jesus' God.

Mainly because of Scripture do I fight so much. LOL Why do you ignore the Scripture, such as Matthew 7:21?

You are so emotionally invested in this that you fail to realize that 2 is not 3. The trinity is just a front to advance the man-is-God thesis. That is why you present a verse that is silent on the non-existent 3rd person while holding it as definitive support of trinitarian doctrine. What is...

Total project onto unitarian text. If Jesus said to baptize in the name of Moe, Larry & Curly, it does not mean they are God or equal. In addition, Matthew 28:19 is a corruption not found in the original text. See my thread on why the Apostles disobeyed the resurrected Jesus. do we see the...

No. Jesus figuratively says this. The expression continues to this day. I tell people my wife and I are of one mind, etc. This is a figurative expression meaning in today's colloquialism 'on the same page.'

A new command I give you ... don’t do anything to let the world know you are holy, set apart, have the Spirit of God within you?! I understand why you don’t want to debate. You are comfortable not being accountable. Words. Lip service. 14 What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone...

Why did Paul talk about there being no sacrifice to cover the sin of turning from Christ? Belief is irrelevant. Faith through action is what we will be held accountable for. Those who believe in Jesus but do not feed him, clothe him or give him something to drink are the goats.

The original Greek has no punctuation. What does the following sentence mean: LET’S EAT GRANDMA.

I guess that is where we differ.