Search results

It is not God but your disregard for Scripture, which is false doctrine. See Matthew 7:21. See Parable of 3 Servants. See salt losing flavor. See vine who don’t bear fruit thrown into fire. See James, a faith without works is dead. As John Wesley noted, we are not saved by works but faith is...

If the above were true, then universalism is correct doctrine. What’s precious are not those who call Jesus Lord but actually do the will of God. It is for these fruit bearing vines that the Son of God’s blood was spilled - and no one else. This is the Elect.

They are not saved but thrown away.

So, what do you make of Jesus talking about salt losing it’s flavor?

It’s amazing how totally opposite the truth is. What you asked is what trinitarian suppose. The Father. The Son. Two different beings. Two different persons.

At least once a day.

Trinitarianism parsed synonyms persons and beings. No scriptural support for this

No. I believe God is one (unitarian). And the Bible is right and trinitarians are wrong.

It is amazing how desperate trinitarians cannot accept John 1:1 is figurative. In the beginning was the Word (of Joe Biden), and the Word was with <Joe Biden>, and the Word was <Joe Biden>. Joe Biden is not a word. People/beings are not words.

That's how strong the trinitarian dogma is. Nowhere does it say anything like this in the Bible. How about if we look at what Jesus says is the stipulation? Hunter is the son of Joe. This does not make Hunter Joe. 24 Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny...

I've read that a couple of weeks ago but don't understand the significance.

The Case Against the Trinity

Then you have no concept of logic, statistics or law. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Claiming something is true does not make it so. Bad or non-existent reasoned argument is revealing.

Yup. A simple diversion. A little humility would go a long way. Something like, 'Wrangler, you presented a lot of compelling evidence. I admire your knowledge on the subject and will have to reflect on the overwhelming evidence you've presented.' That'd be nice. Instead, you be like "(Since I...

Evidence. Where is your evidence you asked. Now, you don't want evidence. You want to change the subject from what Scripture states to me. Appeal to Ad Homenim.

The burden of evidence is on the one making the positive claim. IF there were a verse in the Bible that said something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever it would...

I also thought it was bold for him to ask the Lord to let him walk out of the hospital. I doubt any of my prayers are so bold.

Yea right! The verse says NOTHING about the nature of God. The trinity is not in the Bible - not the word, not the concept. In addition, Matthew 28:19 is a corruption, not found in the original text. See my thread on why the Apostles disobeyed the risen Christ.

Can't answer my question. Gotcha!

Experience both reveals and builds character. Christianity would be easy if it weren't for all the SOB's in the world. That is, talk is cheap. Actually walking the walk is something to behold. Also, I'm reminded of the parable of the 3 servants (Matthew 25:14-30), who were given little, found 2...