Search results

Burping gracefully is sexy. :-) Kid joke for you. What is Beethovan's favorite fruit? Ba-na-na-na.

I have no idea where you get this from. The text in question merely talks about the dragon being chained for that long, not resurrected people living a millennia before second death.

Wrong. Elohim is a Hebrew term for heavenly beings. Proof that you are wrong is the Unitarian/Monotheist authors reject the trinity. That is, for 1,000's of years they do not take GE 1:26 as plurality of the one God. It is mere trinitarian projection onto unitarian text.

Again, Jn 3:5 does not not even reference a sacrament. You want to read 'baptism' into the text.

Heavenly beings IS PLURAL. Learn the difference between genus and species.

Not an argument. Jn 3:5 does not even reference a sacrament.

Untrue. Elohim means heavenly beings. There is only one God, which by definition, is singular.

Yes. I'm too tired to research the Scripture but recall in Bible Study those being rescued in Abraham's Bosom. In the study, this is the top level of hell. There is no verse that supports him going deep into the pit.

Blame man first policy eh? The main point in the main post I made is that God's favor comes after obedience. Stop making excuses for some Christians to not obey God in obeying/submitting/respecting/putting their husband first (just because these Christians are female). The last verse in...

Sad appeal to legalism. Thanks for pulling up these verses. :) What's wrong with the thief reference? How old are you? We live in the age after the death of the savior. So, why are you addressing theological points AS IF they are a function of history? And this is not theologically...

One reason is heat & energy. Suppose a thread is started about 'war is bad' or 'peace is good.' Must will agree and there is not too much to say. But when you get into controversy, it sparks interest, which unfortunately leads to bickering, as you say. Getting back to the point of this thread...

I too thought the title and actual subject under discussion were a bit disjointed. I told a friend about this thread and my last post about sacrifice before favor of God. I referenced Jesus sacrificing his life AND THEN announced he had received the favor of God, e.g., been given all authority...

Yet, you express what is not admittedly an ignorant and inflammatory opinion. Yea, rather than humbly admit you are making statements you don't know about, you assert statistics. So, even though you are wrong, you are, from a certain POV right eh? How humble! It began to feel that way with...

No, I am not placing my own interpretation on scripture. It is the interpretation from the text. Reading comprehension. Possessive words mean possession, i.e., property. "Charlie's Angels" refers to the angels belonging to Charlie, his angels.

While, true this thread is about the favor of God.

The flip side of God's favor is the great burden's and sacrifices men make for the establishment of society and their families. There is no equality there. Men built society. Women benefit from what men built, as much as they complain about it. This is why throughout all of human history in all...

It is wrong. One thread is a debate thread about property rights. This thread is not a debate thread and is about a personal journey. April_Rose was complaining about the mixing of these 2 threads - and understandably so.

You have no idea what you are talking about. This is judgmentalism. I hope you don't spread false doctrine. Wrong. Scripture says this over and over and over again. It is the whole purpose for commandment, you shall not covet your neighbor's wife. The property owner is the husband. (The...

Then there is the story of the only one of Jacob's children who does not become a nation or become a tribe of Israel, his only daughter, Dinah. She was raped but her brother's took vengeance for her.

Soul, I'm just going to put you on ignore. Have a blessed day. Wrangler