Search results

Not buying your rationalization of special interpretation of words. Obviously head means authority. It never means source.

I do quote you correctly and attempt to put what you write in context. If you want to stand by a sliver of a long post that is wrong, like 'angels have nothing to do with God', bless your heart. A humble man would concede such portions of what you write are not correct. Or as you are fond of ERROR.

Interesting. My answer is that we can be pleasing to God by emptying ourselves, leaving us open to be filled with the Holy Spirit of God. But for those who love Me and keep My directives, their children will experience My loyal love for a thousand generations. Exodus 20:6 (Voice)

I know I cannot meet your standards of discourse. Oh well. Easier to criticize than address the point of discernment.

Yea, better to divert attention from the implication of these verses. Jesus is not God. The trinity is not God.

LOL You do twist yourself into knots with all your mental gymnastics.

Agreed. Like pretending trinity is in the Bible when it is not.

What is true is not determined by polls. Just because a majority of Christians believed the Earth was the center of the solar system does not make it true.

Repeating your abuse of language does not make my logic wrong. The Buddha said the beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name. You are not wise because you are deliberately calling things by improper names. It's so odd that you want to hold others to interpret as you want, your...

Interesting. I was raised Catholic. My grandmothers and aunts were devout but the church always seemed spiritless to me. I left as soon as my mother's yoke allowed.

That's because you fail to discern honour from worship. I'll honor Mary all day long but I worship only God, aka the Father.

Interesting. There is a verse that says all the saints are now (low) priests.

And this is not a subset in your estimation? Unqualified. Qualified. Not equal.

How do you know this? (Let's watch the circular reasoning unfold)

Yea, cuz normal grammatical usage causes your flawed doctrine to fall apart.

Except it is not true. One trinitarian lie is that only a God can be accused of blasphemy. The accusation the Pharisees made was that he was the Messiah, not God incarnate.

I already have proven you wrong dozens of times. But there is one thing I want you to know: The head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 1 Corinthians 11:3 You must not have any other god but me. Exodus 20:3

The projecting man-is-God thesis onto the text is impressive mental gymnastics. Isaiah was an anti-trinitarian Hebrew, like all Bible writers who have rejected trinitarian interpretation of their text for 1,000 of years.

You are in ERROR to suppose a non-trinitarian interpretation is in ERROR.

Isaiah 9:6 does no such thing. The most obvious proof is Jews reject the man-is-God take on their own anti-trinitarian text. Isaiah 9:6[5] does not speak of a divine king (or Messiah). - فريق اللاهوت الدفاعي