Search results

I couldn't care less what they taught about Mary. I'm not a Reformer. Does Catholicism teach that she was sinless? That is my understanding. Is that your understanding and belief as well?

Afraid of the truth? That is a lie. No matter what I say about Catholic doctrine (and I've said things about some of those doctrines already, which you ignore), you will disagree. So, what is the point? This is not a Catholic doctrines forum, it's an eschatology forum. So, that's primarily what...

Are you saying you agree with this? I hope not.

You know how many posts are in this thread at this point? I have posted about the purgatory nonsense, the pope nonsense, the sinless Mary nonsense, the literal drinking of Jesus's blood and literal eating of His body nonsense and other doctrinal nonsense that Catholics believe. You are being...

Oh, so you think your doctrines regarding purgatory, the pope, Supposedly Sinless Mary, etc. are sound doctrines with no holes in them, do ya? LOL! Thanks for yet another laugh, Einstein Junior. And for the continuous clown show.

A strong clue about what exactly? Yes, and is that not what is described in 1 Thess 5:2-3? Is that not what an event that is coming like a thief in the night resulting in sudden destruction implies? Yes. And your point is?

But, why did you feel the need to point that out? Did I give any indication that I thought you assumed similarly worded scriptures must always be about the same event? I assume the "judgment of Israel" is a reference to what happened in 70 AD? What "judgment of the Gentiles" are you talking...

I've already poked plenty of holes in your clown show and in false Catholic doctrines. Which you just ignore. You can't even type and then you try to make fun of someone else's intelligence. LOL. Nice one, Einstein Junior. If you want to insist on continuing to make a fool of yourself, then I...

I used to think like this and thought that it was talking about a general increase in knowledge. But, I no longer believe that. The question that should be considered is what type of knowledge is Daniel 12:4 talking about? General knowledge, including even meaningless or nearly meaningless...

The thing that makes him different than people like you, me, covenantee, WPM, Christian Gedge and jeffweeder is that he is a futurist and we are not. For example, he sees the entire Olivet Discourse as being unfulfilled which Amils like you and me disagree with. We disagree with the partial...

You are just trying too hard and that is resulting in complete nonsense. The reference to the Messiah being cut off is a clear reference to the crucifixion of Christ and is referring to the same thing Isaiah prophesied about here: Isaiah 53:8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away. Yet...

In Acts 2 that time period is referred to as "the last days", not "the day of the Lord". And Peter does not refer to "the last day of the Lord" in 2 Peter 3, either. He just calls it "the day of the Lord" which is the day Christ returns, we are all caught up to Him and He destroys all of His...

How are you coming to this conclusion? You should know better by now than to just make a statement like this without backing it up. I can't take that seriously.

Who told you that I "always assume that"? Not me. But, in the case of 1 Thess 4:14-5:3 and 2 Thess 1:7-10 they are clearly speaking of the same event that results in the destruction of all of Christ's enemies. The context of each passage is directly related to the day Christ returns and what...

Why did you stop quoting there? Are you being purposely dishonest here? Mark 9:11 And they asked him, “Why do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first?” 12 Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah does come first, and restores all things. Why then is it written that the Son of Man must...

Have you never read this: Luke 1:13 But the angel said to him: “Do not be afraid, Zechariah; your prayer has been heard. Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to call him John. 14 He will be a joy and delight to you, and many will rejoice because of his birth, 15 for he will be...

What is "the boared". And he clearly did not deny itter.

LOL. Catholicism is obviously bigoted against deaf people.

Yeah, I pointed this out to him already, but then he clarified that he was saying that Jesus doesn't descend to the earth at the rapture. So, he was not careful to be clear about what he was saying. Which is a common problem on this forum.

You should educate yourself about what other people believe in regards to eschatology so that you don't make yourself look bad by misrepresenting what others believe because of assumptions that you're making. Where does scripture teach this? You don't have scripture on your side here...