Search results

* That’s better than I can do. *

I’m with you. Applying Moses typology to Jesus is one thing, to Trump (or anyone else) another thing entirely. The apostles would never go along with referring to anyone other than Jesus* as the second (or new) Moses. * Certainly not Muhammad @amigo de christo.

* College. Calculus. I was required to take five semesters of it in order to earn my degree in civil engineering. Two and a half years studying a subject in great depth and never once used it during my 35 year career in engineering. High school. How to dissect a frog. I came across many frogs...

“… Moses is understood to be a type of Christ because Christ is the New Lawgiver.” https://www.dbu.edu/mitchell/worldview-literature/typology.html

Moses typology -> Jesus is the second, or new, Moses. For any and all who are or may be concerned about it, it has nothing to do with merging religions.

Anyone who cares whether or not I call Jesus, the Messiah, Son of the living God divine or not can search my posts. (If they do, they will find that I do.) But this thread isn’t about me; nor is it about Dr. Ramsay. It is about the earliest Christians believing that the Messiah is the “new...

He’s deceased. Affirmed the Nicene Creed, which he speaks about occasionally in his book. What he doesn’t do is force the apostles into being something which they weren’t.

* Is this strictly an Indiana thing or will a bag of chips from any state do? *