Search results

What is the actual name of the son that Jesus commanded them to be baptized in per the verse you posted? I ask this to continue to explain why the Apostles and disciples always and only baptized in the name of Jesus without any mention of "Father" or "Holy Ghost" in their baptisms of the book...

Here is the scriptural evidence of the verbal use of "in the name of Jesus".... 6 Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk.... 16 And his name through faith in his name... 17 But that it spread no...

No oil means they had extra oil??? No money means you have extra money??? I see lamps without oil, not extra oil. You make stuff up on the fly, Davy.

Not metaphors, but SIGNS in Rev.... The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: 99% literal and 1% signs. I hope you don't think stop signs are...

I think that you don't think the Great Tribulation is that great.

Is this your excuse to hide in your bunker from helping those under the wrath of God during the GT?

I definitely don't understand your idea of the saints being decimated by the wrath of God along with the sinners during the GT.

You saw it. It's too late. Now you know..... Matt 24... 40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. 41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.... 1 Thes 4-5... 17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be...

As long as I don't call my Bible a metaphor like you do....

Enoch(righteous) taken up before wrath, Noah(righteous) taken up before wrath, Lot(righteous) taken out before wrath... Davy says Church taken AFTER wrath....LOL.

Matt 24 says saints taken, then a thief, then a drunken servant... 1 Thes 4-5 says saints taken, then a thief, then a drunken servant.... Just ignore this fact and blow it off as a councidence. You see it...too late.

The verse(27 in red) is speaking of the trib saints that survive into the Millennial reign and those already in heaven at the marriage supper of Rev 19... All in Heaven... 6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty...

All I told you is I use scripture and you use commentary to create doctrine. This is why the RCC flipped out against Luther. He said "sola scriptura" and the RCC said "mucho commentaria". You are from the same RCC mold.

The disconnect with the RCC is simple. They think the name of the son per Matt 28:19 is "son". They call Jesus, "son". Jesus is their son. Ma ry is their queen mother.

I said... You said... Ah, magical incantations! .... Bite your tongue.

The Baptists call the name of Jesus a "magical formula". How dare they. All because they refuse to be baptized in Jesus name. Some have said it is white magic to say the name of Jesus during baptism. The RCC would not even say that. The Baptists are more sacriligious than the RCC. Think...

Believing is the qualifier to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. If a person does not believe they should not be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.

I totally agree.

You missed it again Catholic, the problem you have is you were baptized wrong and need to be baptized just like the 12 men in Acts chapter 19. You refuse. You think being baptized as a baby is going to do the trick. Wow. What a sham.

Again, the Roman Catholic Church is all about commentary. I had a debate with a priest in his office and there were several people there to witness it. I brought my Bible alone and he brought an arm full of books and dropped them on the table to try to counter my Bible. You are doing the same thing.