Search results

Why are you not being honest with him about this? You do not believe Jesus existed in any way, shape or form before He was born to the virgin Mary. That is what you have said before. Why did you not inform him of this? You deny that the Word in this passage is referring to Jesus: John 1:1 In...

LOL. Nonsense. He was saying this (what was happening on the day of Pentecost) is what Joel prophesied about. That is obvious. I've never seen anyone deny obvious things more than you do. Do you think Peter just decided to randomly quote a passage at that point that had nothing to do with...

Why did you quote verse 21 without also quoting verse 20? Luke 17:20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the...

No, Jesus made it clear that their error was thinking that the Messiah's kingdom would come with observation. He said that it did not come with observation (Luke 17:20). You are making the same mistake as the Pharisees by thinking His kingdom will come with observation. The kingdom will not come...

Well, I didn't wonder anymore after you explained it to me awhile back. I don't blame you for doing that and would never suggest that you shouldn't. It's just not my focus. I just don't personally have the same desire to do that, but I'm glad you do. Yes, I can fully understand that. Please...

This is nothing short of insane. You have proven yet again that you will twist scripture in any way you can to get it to say what you want it to say. This is just plain shameful. I have no respect for you because of how you twist scripture like this. There is no basis whatsoever to think that he...

Yes, we do. And you're doing a terrible job of that. He contrasts two groups within the corporate body (nation) of Israel. One is the remnant saved by grace (Romans 11:5). And then there is "the others" who were not saved and their hearts were hardened (Romans 11:7). So, when he said in Romans...

Good. Of course. Now you've gone completely astray. Under what other covenant besides the new covenant can Gentiles be saved? The new covenant is all about Jesus sacrificing Himself so that people could be saved and have their sins forgiven. He died for Gentiles, too, right? Have you never...

Yes, it is. You will continue to misinterpret the Old Testament as long as you insist on trying to interpret it in isolation without the aid of the New Testament. That's the bottom line. You are not allowing the New Testament authors to give you enlightenment in regards to what the Old Testament...

Don't act like you have a better understanding of Hosea than Paul. He included Gentiles as being the ones who God would call His people who were not formerly His people. You are trying to force Paul to say something different than what he actually said just because of how you read Hosea. Let...

Are you even reading the passages I'm referencing? In Romans 9:24 Paul said "even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles". Did you just completely disregard that part? He was talking about Jews AND Gentiles. Before Christ came to bring Jew and Gentile...

But, he said some did obtain it, which were the remnant he mentioned in verse 5. Why are you ignoring that? You're acting as if he said none of them obtained it, as in the entire nation of Israel didn't obtain it, but that is not at all what he said. Yes, and do you know why he said that...

This was already pointed out to you by WPM, but I want to point this out again because you shouldn't miss this. Look at this passage: Romans 9:22 What if God, although choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for...

I do. It is honestly difficult to believe that you are for real. That isn't possible since I don't drink coffee. But, if we did meet in person and we were talking about the same things we're talking about here, I absolutely would talk to you this way. LOL. That was a good one. I have found...

Were those people formerly not the people of God? Isn't it your contention that the Jews are the people of God? If so, how could he have been saying that they were formerly the people of God if he was talking only to Jews?

So? Do you not understand that there is a spiritual family line that goes back to Abraham which consists of those who belong to Christ? Galatians 3:26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with...

Let's put your theory that Paul was not talking about individuals starting in Romans 11:6 to the test. Romans 11:17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18...

I will not. I find all of your beliefs to be complete nonsense. Especially your denial of the deity of Christ, but all of your other beliefs that you have shared as well. I don't know if I agree with you on one single thing. Is that something to admit? I think I've made that pretty clear. I...

I agree and you illustrated that very well. There's just a complete contrast between an emphasis and focus on what is eternal, spiritual and heavenly (the Amil focus) and what is temporal, carnal and earthly (the Premil focus).

No, the Amill doctrine started with scripture itself. Stop your lies. No, it was not. You can't back up that claim, that's for sure. You really should not comment at all on this particular issue since you have the insane belief that a multitude of people will be resurrected with mortal bodies...