Search results

LOL! Then you should also agree that "this" was "that" (the prophecy from Joel 2:28-32), but you don't believe "this" was "that" at all. He didn't need to. Part of what that prophecy entails is that all who call on the name of the Lord will be saved. Well, it wasn't just on the day of Pentecost...

Such nonsense. It never ends coming from you. I can't take you seriously and I can't imagine anyone else can, either. You twist things constantly to fit your view. It's pathetic. Yes, we do, and maybe you will learn to do that some day. It's clear to me that no matter what I say to refute your...

Right. It's insane. It's a doctrine of devils (1 Timothy 4:1). I couldn't agree more. They, of course, are blind to this. But, their expectations match up very closely to the expectations that the Pharisees had of the future.

Exactly. Dispensationalists fail to recognize that Paul contrasted elect/saved Israelites from unsaved Israelites throughout Romans 11. They act as if all of them were cut off back then and one day all of them will be grafted in (saved). But, that isn't what Paul was saying at all. He contrasted...

The Jews were not previously a people before Christ came? That's nonsense. Peter could not possibly have been speaking of the Jews there. That statement could only apply to Gentiles. And it's likely he was including believing Jews as well because it had not previously been the case that Jew and...

Stop the nonsense. When Peter said "this" in Acts 2:16, he was clearly talking about what was happening on the day of Pentecost. That is undeniable. And he said "this", which was what was happening on that day, was what Joel had prophesied about in Joel 2:28-32. That doesn't mean the prophecy...

Christians are God's chosen people! You referenced Romans 11:18. Do you have any understanding of Romans 11 at all? That talks about Gentile believers being grafted in with Israelite believers. That makes Gentile believers His chosen people as well. How can you not know this? Surely, it's not...

So, you think people like the Jewish Pharisees and scribes that Jesus called hypocrites and snakes are part of a holy nation? LOL. No, they were part of an unholy nation. You're not reading 1 Peter 2:9 in context. 1 Peter 2:9 But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s...

Yes, so the new covenant was established long ago by the blood of Christ. Glad we can agree on that. You had previously said "Can I ask you specifically what new covenant you are referring to ?", so that gave the impression that you believed in more than one new covenant.

Sure. Revelation 6:9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. 10 They called out in a loud voice, “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the...

No, I'm not. Jesus's kingdom exists NOW as scripture makes very clear. When He comes again at the end of the age, He will deliver His kingdom to the Father (1 Cor 15:22-24, Matt 13:40-43).

This is obvious to us, yet CadyandZoe denies that the day of Pentecost fulfilled Joel 2:28-32 at all, which is obviously ludicrous.

LOL. He said "this IS that", not "this is LIKE that". You will go to any length to support your false doctrines. That is clear to me. It's shameful.

That is a complete lie. It's a sin to lie. You should repent of your lying. If you take away your lies, you have nothing left to support your false doctrine.

This is a lie. Amillennialism began well before that. On this forum I have found that almost all of the Premils here are willing to resort to lying about Amillennialism in order to try to make it look bad. You know that lying is a sin, don't you Davy?

No. Not even a million words can.

No, the earliest identified Amillennialists were the authors of the Bible. These arguments in this thread are all extremely weak. You are wasting your time.

What is this nonsense? It's very clear that the word "thousand" is used figuratively in Psalm 50:10. It's futile to try to say otherwise. That doesn't mean it must be used that way in Revelation 20 as well, but it does mean it CAN be used that way in Revelation 20. Some people deny that...

o_O I thought we just had to repent and put our faith in Christ in order to reign with Christ? We also need to chop our own heads off? :Laughingoutloud:

I could not care less about that. You should have the Holy Spirit as your teacher. But, do you know what that means? Your previous post would suggest that you don't.