Search results

What would be the purpose of these supposed offerings at this supposed Millennial temple? Keep in mind that keeping the feast of tabernacles involves giving offerings for the atonement of sins.

Just as a reminder, "the above passage" you referenced here was 2 Peter 3:10-13. That passage is talking about something that will happen in fulfilling the promise of Christ's second coming, which means it will happen when He comes as a thief in the night, not 1,000+ years later as you believe...

Where is one hour defined as a time span? As for 1,000 years, there's only two other verses in all of scripture that refer to a thousand years besides in Revelation 20 (Psalm 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8), so that is no basis for drawing the conclusion that it can't refer to an undefined time span in...

And that is rather ironic, isn't it? :D

You should look in the mirror, Randy. I see those same kinds of things from you on this forum as well. You are not obligated to talk about this doctrine as much as you do. Yet, you talk about it quite a bit. So, who exactly is supposedly placing too much importance on it? If it's not that...

Yet, he also said that scripture must be spiritually discerned. Also, Peter said that Paul taught some things that are hard to understand (2 Peter 3:16), so I'm not so sure that "keeping it simple" is really a good approach when it comes to the deeper things. Yes, the basics of Christianity are...

My point was to show that "a thousand" is used figuratively elsewhere in scripture, so that means it's possible for Revelation 20 as well. I'm not saying the word "thousand" must be figurative in Revelation 20 since it's sometimes used figuratively elsewhere. I'm just saying that means it's...

When did Jesus ever mention that He "would rule from the literal, physical Jerusalem"?

Do you believe it's talking about literal locusts?

This is the most ridiculous question that anyone has ever asked me. You only don't think so? My goodness, am I wasting my time on here? Times like this make me wonder. When did I explain away your verses? I can't make sense of anything you're saying here. Are you not able to communicate more...

That is not at all what the text says. What you're saying here is what doesn't hold water. At all. It very clearly says He would be cut off AFTER the 69th week and it doesn't say how long after. You are changing it to say at the end of the 69th week instead of after the 69th week. You are...

That is a lie. Do you deny that the saved will stand before Him to be judged as well? That is what scripture teaches (Romans 14:10-12, 2 Cor 5:10, Matthew 25:31-46).

Again, that is not true. I don't need you to tell me what I believe. I will tell you what I believe. I don't believe in a symbolic resurrection in Christ. I believe that we spiritually have part in His bodily resurrection when we go from being spiritually dead in sins to spiritually alive in...

I was talking about Premils, but did you somehow miss that I said "some of them"? That means not all of them. So, I wasn't talking about you. That is not at all what I'm doing. That is not at all what the warning is about. The warning is about people PURPOSELY twisting the text to say something...

Of course context matters. We all believe that. Show me the scripture which teaches this. I don't need to go by your man-made rules. He didn't say to interpret it all literally! Which is basically what you're saying here. That's nonsense! You are trying to tell me that God said to interpret an...

What is your point here? Who said that is symbolic? It seems that you're saying only mankind's works will be destroyed? That was some rather selective quoting there. Why didn't you quote this part: 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens...

But, I'm not making that argument and you're talking to me. Don't lump me in with them. That is your opinion, but there is no grammar rule or anything like that which demands that it is being used literally in Revelation 20, if that's what you're implying.

LOL! Excellent job of missing the point. Well done. So, is it your belief that it's talking about a literal one thousand generations then? Is that what you're trying to say? Or do you even know what you're trying to say?

I'm not being silly at all and everyone else besides you here knows it. No kidding! Do you think I believe otherwise? It can. But not necessarily. That's my point. No kidding! That's what I'm saying. All I was doing was showing that the word can be used figuratively. Some think the word has to...

LOL. Obviously. But, you thought wrong. I'm sorry, where did I tell you to twist the book? Now you're resorting to lying? I'm starting to lose a lot of respect for you, Randy. What are you talking about? The world as we know it will end at the second coming. But, I'm not saying the earth will be...