Search results

Jesus knew. You understand that, right? I'm not buying this argument you're making at all. Jesus talked about His "other sheep" in John 10, so it's not as if He didn't know that He would be be bringing Jew and Gentile believers together as one through His sacrifice. What? I beg to differ...

Can you show where this 7 year time period fits in these passages that talk about the day of the Lord? 1 Thessalonians 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon...

When did I say that? You're always misrepresenting my view and changing the topic. Why are you trying to turn this into a discussion about what is or isn't possible for God? You know that's not what this discussion is about. Everyone here believes that all things are possible for God, and you...

LOL. Keep avoiding backing up your claims then. Can only assume it's because you can't. How is it derailing a thread when you respond to claims made within the thread? That's ridiculous. In case you somehow didn't notice, a thread called "22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine" was...

It doesn't matter who He was speaking to, it matters who He was speaking about. He is only coming once in the future and there is only one judgment day, so there is no basis whatsoever to claim that passages like 1 Thess 4:13-17 and Matthew 24:29-31 are different events or that Matthew 25:31-46...

You don't realize how poor you are at communicating. You need to think more before you post. You don't even realize what you imply by what you say. You said, in relation to Jesus: Then I showed that Jesus is the Prince of Peace. Do you think He does not rule over kings as the Prince of Peace...

So? What difference does it make if I show He is a prince in Hebrew or in Greek? You were denying that He is a prince at all. I proved you wrong. Just admit it and be glad you learned something. I wasn't the one making that claim. I think that it very well could be the case if it's talking about...

Paul is clearly referring to the bodily resurrection of the dead in Christ in 1 Thess 4:14-17. Are you denying that? If not, then what is the reason for pointing out the differences in what words are used to describe that? That seems completely pointless. I disagree. We clearly are very far...

Translation: You are not able to defend the claims you are making in this thread, which makes this thread pointless. Why don't you just admit that then trying to make me stop pointing out how weak your arguments are? Don't tell me what to do. You're talking about these things in this thread, so...

LOL. No Premil has ever accused me of that before. Thanks for the laugh. I'm not saying both. Do you have anything to offer besides false accusations? To say that the earth is destroyed or burned up does not have to equate to saying it will be completely annihilated even to the core. We talk...

You obviously didn't take my advice. It indicates that Jesus is the One who opens the 7th seal and the seals are all opened in heaven. Yet, you have Him on earth at that point. I guess logic isn't something that is important to you.

You're saying that the dead being raised incorruptible in 1 Cor 15:52 refers to "those alive at the Second Coming". Do you know what the words "dead" and "alive" mean? Are you aware that those words are not synonyms?

Where is this supposed difference taught in scripture? Don't just make claims without backing them up. That isn't going to convince anyone of anything. How do you interpret this passage: 2 Thessalonians 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from...

Amils should be able to challenge these supposed errors and you should be able to respond to those challenges. This thread is a sham. It's just a bunch of claims that you can't back up.

You're apparently lacking discernment then. You were acting like it. LOL. That was only in regards to talking about what the early church fathers believed. That topic isn't of great interest to me, so it gets old to me fairly quickly. I wasn't in the pit at all, man. That's why I'm saying you...

Exactly. I've made this same argument to him several times and he just tries to gloss over it instead of accepting what it clearly indicates, which is that believers will be rewarded and unbelievers will be condemned at His return and not 1000+ years later.

Yep. Some people do zero research before making their ridiculous claims. They should be embarrassed.

Ahem. You're trying to say Jesus is not a prince and only the KJV gives that impression? I beg to differ. Isaiah 9:6 (NIV) For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The...

Says the blind man. I suggest that you don't waste your time trying to tell me what to do and to stop judging me as if you have any idea of how much time I spend find out what God plans for the future. You completely ignore the spiritual aspects of what is coming in the future. That reveals your...

Why are you avoiding addressing all of the scriptural support I'm providing for my view? Why are you completely unable to show how your interpretation of Revelation 19-20 lines up with all these other scriptures that I've brought up? That says a lot that you can't do that. When you try, you just...