Search results

Well, it's just one person saying that as far as I can tell. But, maybe others believe that as well. Why? I really have no idea. I haven't seen any explanation given for it.

Please stop being ignorant. It is absolutely not true that "most Amills if not all are Partial Preterists". If you keep saying things like that then it will become impossible to take you seriously. Educate yourself before saying such ignorant things.

How am I pretending that it is? I'm talking about the kingdom that is not of this world, does not come with observation and is experienced by way of peace and joy through the Holy Spirit. Is that the kingdom you're talking about? If not, then you have your focus on the wrong kingdom.

You have a flawed understanding of what it means to be a king. Think of any earthly king. Did that king reign only over those who submitted to him or did he reign over everyone in his kingdom whether they liked it or not? Clearly, he reigns over everyone. Whether everyone likes it or not is...

I honestly don't know. It seems that doctrinal bias blinds many people to things even as obvious as this. I mean, could Jesus have been any more clear and straightforward when He said He was given all power/authority in heaven and earth? There is no one and nothing that He doesn't currently...

No, complete nonsense is when someone like you thinks that a symbolic sword (you acknowledge that it's symbolic) can somehow be used in a literal, physical way to kill people. You can't get any more nonsensical than that.

Many times in the past I have asked Premils what would make it so that one unbeliever's life would be spared when Christ returns while another unbeliever's life will not? Most of the time they don't even try to answer that question, but when they have their responses have been less than...

Davy, can you tell us exactly who you believe will populate the earth during a supposed future thousand year reign of Christ on earth?

What you have ignored repeatedly is that it describes the destruction of more than just the army. Revelation 19:17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, 18 so that you may eat the...

Was my question too difficult for you to answer? Again, are you calling Amils scoffers in the same sense that Peter was talking about in 2 Peter 3:3-4? Yes or no, please. What do you mean by this? I know you don't like the way I talk to you because of how I point out your nonsense, but one...

That's a lot less than 1,000 years. This doesn't even begin to make any sense. Peter says that the burning up of the heavens and earth occurs upon the arrival of the day of the Lord. So, with your logic, that would mean it would take 1,000 years for that to happen. Which obviously makes no...

So, you can give out petty jabs (as you have done many times), but you can't take them. I see. You have found a way to get out of having to explain why you don't see 1 Thess 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12 as describing the same event. Well done.

There are no conflicting details between Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thess 4:14-17. Not even close. This is a ridiculous claim. They would be conflicting only if 1 Thess 4:14-17 specifically said that Christ was coming without His angels. But, it absolutely does NOT say that. You just assume that...

No, we ARE all God's children and we ARE part of one flock (all of us who belong to Christ, which is all believers from all-time). I don't know what was the point you were trying to make here. Can you elaborate on this? Do you understand that the three groups Paul referenced there are...

You are the expert on creating posts with no substance.

This is your reasoning for saying something ridiculous and pointless? Okay. Another ridiculous statement from you. Of course I don't think that. All you are able to do is say ludicrous things. Why are you here when you are completely incapable of making a coherent argument and all you can do...

What in the world are you talking about? You clearly misunderstood the point I was making. Does that time period need to be referred to specifically as "the thousand years" in order for that time period to be referenced? Of course not. That's my point. No hypocrisy whatsoever. Nice try.

When did I say that time period is of no interest to me? So, you agree that Jesus reigns now. Doesn't that tell you anything about the timing of Revelation 20? It should. Does He not have authority over those who are not in the Church? Of course He does. I quoted Matthew 28:18 where He said He...

What exactly were you intending to say in post #43 when you referenced Revelation 14? Try to be more specific when you post so we're not left guessing as to what you might be trying to say. That depends on what his understanding of the man of sin is. Not everyone sees it as referring to an...

You ignore that Revelation 19:17-18 indicates that He will destroy ALL of His enemies when He returns. You ignore that Revelation 19:15 is referencing Psalm 2:8-9 which talks about Him BREAKING His enemies. That lines up with Him SMITING them and TREADING them in the winepress of God's wrath...