Search results

Right. That clearly portrays Christ destroying His enemies, not ruling over them. The context of Him ruling over them is directly related to Him smiting them and treading them in the winepress of the wrath of God. That's a picture of destruction, not a picture of letting them survive and then...

Are you calling Amils scoffers in the same sense that Peter was talking about in 2 Peter 3:3-4?

Are you not willing to address my point? Other things referenced in Revelation 20 are referenced in other places in the New Testament, so why not the thousand years as well? I'm not saying that it is specifically referenced as "the thousand years" elsewhere, but that time period is referenced...

So, we agree that Jesus is the King now. He reigns now. So, why is your focus on a supposed future reign of Christ on earth when He is already reigning now? Please explain that. I have never avoided discussing Zechariah 14. Why are you lying? I have said many times that I'm not sure how to...

But Revelation 20 references Jesus reigning, references His followers as being priests of God and of Christ, references fire coming down on unbelievers on earth and references the judgment. That is not the first time those things are referenced in the New Testament, so why would you think that...

There is no point in trying to reason with someone who is completely unreasonable.

The Mount Sion there isn't any more literal than Jesus is a literal Lamb, but go ahead and assume it's talking about a physical mountain on earth there. Hebrews 12:18 For ye are not come unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and...

Does every passage that refers to the second coming of Christ need to contain all the same details in order to be talking about the same event? Of course not. So, this is not a valid argument that you're making here. Do you believe Matthew 24:29-31 and Revelation 19:11-21 are referring to the...

That is not true. John 10:16 I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd. The "other sheep" that Jesus referred to were the Gentiles. As other scriptures, like Ephesians 1:11-22...

Jesus reigning and His followers reigning with Him is not important to mention? I couldn't disagree more. And it is mentioned a number of times in the New Testament apart from Revelation 20, but never in terms of Him reigning on the earth. That is something important to consider when...

What are you hoping to accomplish by posting something ridiculous like this? It does nothing but make you look like someone that no one should take seriously.

Peter indicates that the arrival of the day of the Lord brings about the burning up of the heavens and earth. Will it take 1,000+ years to burn up the heavens and the earth? The way you interpret the day of the Lord, that would have to be the case, but that idea is ludicrous. It clearly...

It's called interpreting scripture with scripture. I know that you are not familiar with that concept. One passage, 2 Peter 3:10-12 talks about the burning up of the heavens and earth on the day of the Lord and this passage you quoted talks about "sudden destruction" occurring from which "they...

No, it doesn't make any sense at all to think that any saints would be raised to shame, everlasting contempt and condemnation as Daniel 12:2 and John 5:28-29 talk about. That is impossible. Saints are those who belong to Christ and have had their sins forgiven. They won't have anything to be...

But, you do agree with Amillennialistm in that you believe all living unbelievers will be killed at Christ's return. Remind everyone again about who exactly you think will populate the earth during the thousand years. You believe that dead believers will be resurrected with mortal bodies and...

Answering questions with questions? That's not how discussions are supposed to work. Why didn't you answer my questions? Is Jesus your King now? Is He not the King of all of us who believe in Him right now? Yes or no will suffice.

It's no surprise that you completely ignored the verse I quoted that shows the nature of the kingdom, which that it's a spiritual kingdom of peace, love and joy in the Holy Spirit. Your carnal way of looking at things prevents you from seeing what type of kingdom it actually is.

LOL. No, I don't need to do that. You can see how they translated it. Singular kingdom. It's not plural no matter how much you want to say that it is. Also, there is no other scripture you can point to which teaches this concept of Jesus ruling over multiple kingdoms on earth in the future...

No, that's not at all what I was saying and you know it. The paradise Paul saw was the same paradise that Jesus went to when He died and that was not Hades. That is the point. It seems like you forgot what this discussion was about.

Okay, I didn't catch that. Yes, I did, which is why I was confused because I didn't catch that you were being sarcastic before that. Anyway... I disagree that it supports Premil, but I also don't have any interest in continuing that particular discussion, so I'm not going to say any more about that.