Search results

What must the trinitarians think of the non-trinitarian who plainly and proudly acknowledges that he goes beyond what is written in scripture.

You’ve said multiple times that you are speaking the words that God has given you to speak. It’s not possible, you say, to disagree with what you say without disagreeing with God. I don’t know how anyone could read your posts and not see that. If you are saying what God gave you to say then...

You said the words which you speak aren’t yours; that you’re on mission from / sent by God. That‘s a claim of being a prophet. If you want to backtrack and say that the words which you speak are yours and not God’s, then you’re merely a false teacher.

You have consistently claimed to be a prophet. You are. A false prophet.

That’s fine but it wasn’t going to be deleted or edited by me. I stand by it. Not only does he have a choice, he has an obligation. So does everyone else who reads your posts. This is what comes with the territory of dealing with someone claiming to be a prophet.

False prophets don’t bring the truth. Christians and non-Christians know that. I don’t deny anything that is written in scripture. Speak on, false prophet.

Now you’ve given him a choice: he can either believe you are a true prophet (in which case he has to believe your revelation story) or he can believe you are a false prophet (in which case he would be a fool to believe your cock and bull story).

He thinks he’s a true prophet and presents himself as such. I know that he’s not. You’ll have to decide for yourself whether he is a true prophet or a false prophet. 1 + 1 = 2 -> he’s chastising me for quenching the Holy Spirit. (Which is what people do when they reject a true prophet ->...