Search results

Where do those passages indicate that He doesn't use angels to gather the church to Himself? You're making an argument from silence here. Not all passages that speak of His return contain all of the same details. Both Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thess 4:13-18 speak of His return and of His own...

No, they specifically were marveling at the temple buildings as the text indicates. Stop making things up. Wrong. It's clear to me that you will go to any length to deny even obvious things like this. Are you aware that you can acknowledge that the temple buildings were destroyed just as...

That means nothing. There is no correlation between being Amil and being an evolutionist and you know it.

Again, not all the same details are given in parallel accounts of the same event in the book of Revelation. There's nothing contradictory about that. It's ridiculous to think that parallel accounts of the same event should contain all of the same details about it. Also, your inability to...

Parallel sections of the book of Revelation don't contain all of the same details. This is not a contradiction, this is simply a case of not all the same details being shared in each description of the same event. You proved nothing here just like you've proven nothing with any of the previous...

Fabrication? Are the following verses in your Bible? Matthew 28:16 Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth...

This is a lie. I do not base my doctrine on just a few verses. That could not be further from the truth and I think you know it. No, it does not. Please stop making things up. Unless you want to keep making yourself look bad. In that case, keep doing it, I guess. You stretch a coming...

You don't have to try to give me a lesson about how words can mean different things. What a waste of time. Most words have more than one definition. We all know that. But, what does the word mean in 2 Peter 3:10-12? What is the context? The context relates to the second coming of Christ...

This is ironic coming from you. I have been talking to you the way you were talking to people on here before I came here. I guess you don't like being talked to the way you talk to others? Maybe you should try being more polite then if that's the communication style you prefer? I try to talk...

Maybe you should not make claims on here without being able to back them up. Ever think of that? LOL. You are embarrassing yourself here. You went from claiming that most Bible translators and scholars marked it as spurious to now one group of Bible translators and one other scholar. Can't...

No one would even say that. Nice try, but your analogy is far less than convincing. No one would say it that way. Not a good analogy. You are grasping at straws here.

More often than not, you interpret literal text figuratively and figurative text literally. It's why you are wrong about almost everything. Did Jesus say the meek will inherit the earth (as in this earth) or a completely separate earth from this one (not even this earth renewed)? You could have...

Please tell me how you interpret the following passage: Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7 Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham’s children. On the contrary, “It is through Isaac that your offspring...

They are not temple buildings. The disciples were marveling at the buildings that you could go into that had doors, walls and a ceiling. Mark 13:1 As Jesus was leaving the temple, one of his disciples said to him, “Look, Teacher! What massive stones! What magnificent buildings!” Luke 21:5...

That's your opinion. But, are you not changing the context of Revelation 20:11-15 by saying it does not occur after the thousand years and Satan's little season are completed first even though it clearly does? Yes, I think so. You change the context to fit your doctrine. For something to...

As you almost always do, you missed the point. I don't deny that the GWT occurs outside of our current reality. My point is that it occurs after the thousand years and Satan's little season take place first. A vast majority, whether Amil or Premil, agree with me on that.

And, of course, I already know you believe that, so I'm not sure why you thought you needed to tell me this. I was talking to someone who doesn't believe there are any parallels in the book, as you do. Except for the one parallel he sees that suits his unique perspective of the book.

You're overlooking two obvious facts here. John 5:25 talks about something that relates only to believers while John 5:28-29 relates to both believers and unbelievers. Also, John 5:25 talks about something that "now is" (was already starting to happen) at the time Jesus was speaking but John...

Yet, he tries to claim that most Bible translators think it shouldn't be there. He provided zero evidence to back up that claim. The fact that it IS included in every English Bible translation I looked at (at least 20...I thought that was enough so I stopped looking at that point) tells me...

Do you have any idea at all of what you're talking about here? I've backed up my views with scripture many times for many years, so don't talk to me about not providing answers. I can't answer questions or respond to points that are ridiculous and make no sense. Again, no Amils claims that...