Search results

* Talk to me, moose. *

Even after all the twists and turns that have taken place in this thread, Jesus remains the Son of his God.

From my X / Twitter “For you” feed this afternoon - “Know the difference between being patient and wasting your time.” https://x.com/readswithravi/status/1983560404354867634?s=61

Do your children and grandchildren enjoy reading? Would you like for them to? https://x.com/alexandbooks_/status/1983524816859885626?s=61

Jeremiah and Jesus are both Jewish monotheists who believe in the one God. Neither of them has any belief in “one gods”.

What is that to me? Your argument hasn’t persuaded me and never will. I’ve publicly acknowledged the contrast and leave you with what you are persuaded.

Since you cannot be persuaded, I‘ve reached the point where I‘m simply going to acknowledge that you firmly believe in “one gods”. I believe firmly only in the “one God”. I’m content with the contrast.

It’s not the Holy Spirit telling you that a singular phrase is a plural phrase. It’s not any Bible translation, in any language, which is telling you that a singular phrase is a plural phrase. There is no passage of scripture in any language which uses the phrase “one gods”.

That was the accusation made by his enemies. He corrected them. It is you who is standing with them. Echad elohim isn’t a plural phrase. Every English language translation of the phrase renders it properly, correctly, as a singular phrase in the Bibles we have.

No. I stand against them. Misrepresenting what the Hebrew phrase is when properly translated into English - which is what you have done - doesn’t help your case. It helps mine. The NIDNTT quote I posted is correct. I will use the trinitarian source against you.

No. The echad elohim of Israel / the one God of Israel is the Messiah’s God. See again NIDNTT. What you said about the Hebrew phrase is what appalls me.

Telling people that the correct English translation of the Hebrew phrase echad elohim is “as one gods” is appalling. All English language Bibles translate the phrase correctly. The echad elohim of Israel is the “one God” of Israel. The Messiah isn’t pointing anyone to the “gods of Israel”. The...

The trinitarian source doesn’t do that. That’s not true. English translations of the Hebrew are correct.

Scripture doesn’t need updating. NIDNTT is correct.

Post #340 isn’t false advertising. The quote from NIDNTT (a trinitarian source) is the documentation of who the one God is in scripture.

I don’t have posting privileges in “Christians Only” forums.

I’m not in your league. Having no interest in the monotheism of Israel is having no interest in the God of Israel.

I just finished reading it. My box for todays 10 is checked.