Search results

....says the man that is in a religion that goes door to door every Saturday arguing with strangers.

Exactly. And we get our POWER from our very own Acts 2:38 experience.

Do you see how blunt I am about my beliefs? I am asking you to be so blunt. Listen....all faiths have 'secret doctrines" they are embarrassed of, so when they create a convert, they slowly teach them the details. I will tell the truth to a sinner. I teach Jesus was made God, to the dismay of...

I met myself? I was made clean in the presence of a surrounding light and flattened off the couch under it's LOVING power while talking to God as he called me on the spot. Or, the devil made me feel for hours if I had never sinned in my life, as I physically felt the sanctification of God...

You're welcome. I still save some of his lessons that are relevant and scripturally accurate and forward them as needed. His teaching style is great. I spoke to him for the 1st time over his radio(sirius) program about the Law/Grace debate. He got my attention saying the Law is still in effect...

No sir... 2 And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. 2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. 3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire...

Aaah, so you are saying the ancient commentators were Acts(2:38) skippers too?

The gift of the Holy Ghost is found first given en masse at Acts 2. That is our plumbline.

I was following him and enjoying his ministry until he started teaching on the "Lies" series in Christianity. When he did the water baptism "Lie" part, I had to make him accountable. I still have the emails back and forth(he was nice to accommodate my arguments), but he eventually stopped...

I really like Andrew Farley, but he is a big time Acts 2:38 dodger. I had a brief online debate with him about water baptism essentiality but as he could not answer my questions, he gave up. I still like his other teachings though. I hope he realizes one must obey Acts 2:38 to be saved before...

You make an excellent point....which takes us back to Acts. The only way we can PERSONALLY know we are as individuals are in the true bride of Christ is if we have the identical doctrine and experience as the church of Acts. The vast majority of Christendom rejects Acts 2:38 and draws swords...

Good post. Actually, the son of the Creator was created by a sperm cell the Creator made to fertilize the woman's egg. If the egg self fertilized and no sperm cell was created to fertilize it, the son would not be begotten of God, but of only man, with God "presiding over it". If the son was...

I was being silly(smile). Yes, I am correct in my interpretations. Also, Christians must reject all commentary(old or new) as hearsay. The same goes for today, when now more than ever, we should only appeal to scripture.

Do you know exactly when the Church began?

It is better to be ignorant than to know false redefinitions of the Bible.

I know they... I believe they are.... I hope they are... Yikes!...LOL

"He" is the fella that debunked the KJV in your post 830. Right, there is no ancient dictionary to translating is subjective. You were duped by your source..."he".

I only use scripture as my source. I don't need opinion pieces. No telling who actually wrote them, or who has them, added to them or fabricated them. Best to abandon these "works". They are now disintegrated for at least 1000 years and stuck online...fishy. Stick to the Bible that has been...

Right, the spoken word is with God, is God and was made flesh.

The KJV is wrong and the Greek redefinitionist you quote is right? Why doesn't he make a modern Bible translation to fix their blunder? Oh that's right, he did. He used a thousand year old Greek/English dictionary to debunk the KJV....I see.