Search results

Yes, calling on the name of the Lord to find remission of sins through water baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. The Apostles did not shorten to process to hollering out to God. Religion did that.

No, I teach Jesus was come only in the flesh...no personal divinity. Incarnationists teach Jesus was 100% Spirit and 100% flesh. They teach antichrist doctrine. John knew that incarnationists would arrive someday, making a God/baby.

The word of God is God. The word of you is you. God's word is with Him. Your word is with you. God's word was made Jesus(flesh). God's word also made us. Easy peasy.

30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? 31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. 32 And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house. 33 And he took them the same hour of the night...

I received the baptism of the Holy Ghost in 1979 and practice tongues regularly still. However, the baptism of the Holy Ghost did not remit my sins, but water baptism in the name of Jesus did that year. Some folks teach Acts 2:38 backwards.

Acts 2:38 came first. It still stands first for sinners today, asking "what shall I do". The rest help support it.

Do any of those verses negate the essentiality of water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, or do they magnify it?

You guys teach God was manifested AS flesh.....God was flesh...Spirit was flesh...God became flesh, etc. Fact is, God was manifested INSIDE THE FLESH of His son. Not, God became His son. That is wild, bro.

Nobody can be saved without Acts 2:38.

If you have Acts 2:38 in your experience, do you offer another alternative to sinners than you have? Acts is the book of the Apostles' actions, which we should emulate for all humanity. We must duplicate their doctrine and experience to know we are in that true church, then tell sinners the...

No, you quoted around Acts 2:38 instead of including it doctrinally. This is called being an Acts skipper. Acts is the actions of the Apostles. Christianity today skips the Acts(actions) for themselves, by skipping Acts 2:38. They even have the audacity to skip Acts and read the saints mail...

You skipped Acts again. Bad habit.

I was oneness(a teacher of it). I still teach Acts 2:38, but I teach Jesus was not incarnated now. I teach Jesus was a redo of the 1st Adam and made God by the Col 2:9 effect on his resurrected, quickening spirit body. And yes...the Gentiles were baptized(Acts 10) in the name of Jesus Christ...

I get that. What is the new name for Iesous?

Yes, he is both lord AND God. He is God only by the Col 2:9 effect on his spirit body...after being resurrected. He is not a dead/resurrected God that originated in some woman's ovaries.

You completely skipped Acts 2:38. That is the broad way. Even the devils believe. They also confess Jesus is the son of God. The difference between the Christian faith and the devils faith is Acts 2:38(water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ). That's it.....there is not special "point of...

No sir....faith in the name of Jesus Christ. The name remits sins...no name, no remission. 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins....

You just systematically debunked Jesus per Mark 16:16. 16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

I disagree. The devils cannot believe and be baptized to be saved per Mark 16:16, the same goes for humans that omit water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins.

After God fills a person with the Holy Ghos After God fills someone with the baptism of the Holy Ghost they can't help but to evangelize. We used to preach the world, now we preach to the world.