Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    “For in him” all things were created... What does that mean to you?
  2. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    The “Lord God” is the Messiah’s God and Father, Yahweh. Jesus is the lord Messiah (Psalm 110:1), not the Lord God, Yahweh.
  3. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    I don’t disagree with any of that. In fact, as a believing Jewish monotheist, I insist upon it. “God” -> Yahweh, the God and Father of our lord Jesus Messiah. Yahweh has always sent saviors to save his people (Nehemiah 9:27).
  4. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    Not “by him,” “in him”. When did “these last days” begin? For a Jewish monotheist, it all starts and stops with the Messiah’s God and Father, our God and Father, Yahweh.
  5. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    Yahweh is the Genesis creator, not the Messiah. Yahweh did it alone, by himself (Isaiah 44:24). Yes, I’m a Jewish a Jewish monotheist. The majority of Jewish monotheists don’t believe Jesus of Nazareth, who is also a Jewish monotheist, is the Messiah. I do. Jewish monotheists are, by...
  6. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    “TEXTS WHERE THE USE OF ‘GOD’ FOR JESUS IS DUBIOUS B. Passages where obscurity arises from syntax 6) 2 Peter 1:1“ (Raymond E. Brown, Jesus God And Man, p. 22) So you chose to go with “dubious” and set aside Psalm 110:1. Verse 2 in 2 Peter makes a clear distinction between God and the Messiah...
  7. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    You aren’t reading the passage as a Jewish monotheist would read the passage. The Messiah has a role in bringing about the new creation, not the Genesis creation.
  8. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    He asked me yesterday to stop tagging him. I honored his request. Post in thread 'Jesus was not a Jew?' Jesus was not a Jew? I’m a Jewish monotheist. I post my views, just like every other member of the forum does. He doesn’t like what Jewish monotheism teaches and it got under his skin...
  9. Matthias

    The happy thread

    * That’s a weak monkey if ever I saw one. *
  10. Matthias

    The happy thread

  11. Matthias

    The happy thread

  12. Matthias

    The happy thread

  13. Matthias

    So, you’ve rejected Jesus. Why?

    One of the classic examples in the Hebrew Bible is Exodus 7:1. God made Moses God to Pharaoh. God put his words into Moses’ mouth to speak. Of course no one, then or now, thinks Moses was ontologically, literally, God. Moses was figuratively, functionally, God. Moses was God’s Shaliah. The...
  14. Matthias

    QUOTE for the day

    “There is no greater form of courage than when you out with moral boldness because of your trust in the wisdom, commands, presence, power, and grace of the Lord. - Paul David Tripp
  15. Matthias

    Time Is Short

    * Balance this, however, with Psalm 90:12. *
  16. Matthias

    The happy thread

    * That’s fascinating but I’m going to need a different set of directions. *
  17. Matthias

    To the only God our Savior

    I’ll return to Fortman shortly. I want to give anyone who truly wants to discuss what I’ve already quoted from him an opportunity to do so. In my reading of Jesus this evening, Revelation 7:10 - “They were shouting at the top of their voices, ‘Salvation belongs to our God, to the one who sits...
  18. Matthias

    So, you’ve rejected Jesus. Why?

    I’ve been a Jewish monotheist since 1997. Yes and no. See the Jewish law of agency. Jesus is functionally God, not ontologically God, in Jewish monotheism.
  19. Matthias

    The happy thread

    * I hope she lived long enough to find out that she’s wrong. And I hope Thag was there, alive and well, if she did. *
  20. Matthias

    The happy thread

    * What are most bobcats named then? If it’s a fact then there should be data available to support it. *