Search results

:watching and waiting:

Regarding the Coke can - A weight was placed on top. It didn't free fall on its own weight like the towers did. - A Coke can is not a building. It's only designed to hold liquid. - A Coke can doesn't have columns, it's just a thin aluminium sheet in the form of a cylinder. - A Coke can is not to...

You know that video I posted. I learned that they lied about the physics and metallurgy in order to make the computer models collapse the same way. In their calculations they made the building twice as heavy and they made the columns three times weaker. This is outright fraud.

I'm Victorian but I never heard of that one. I don't watch the news that often so maybe I missed it. When was this? PS. I looked into it and it happened in 2021 in Warnambool... What an absolute disgrace

I didn't see a Coke can example but a Coke can is very weak. It's not built like a building it's only designed to hold liquid. It's not designed to support a large mass nor does it have interior colums. So it's not comparable. If you want to make a fair comparison then you must look at other...

We do. That information is easily obtained. Sorry, not were not. We used engineering principals, mathematics and physics to draw our conclusion. The whole class and several engineering teachers, without any media or political influence. Watched the video. It's a different explanation again...

It's true that the colums at the impact area could have been weakened and buckled causing those levels to drop. But the columns on the levels below were not effected by any fire. They couldn't of just given way on their own creating an accelerated free fall. They must of provided resistance...

Still think morals should be taught by parents. Look at what happens when you let schools teach it. They start pushing lgbt ideas onto kids. Schools should stick to teaching maths, language, history, practical science, sport, music, etc.

These crazy women want to be able to kill children of all ages, not just the unborn ones. It reminds me of the "believe all women" movement. Remember that? Believe all women cos they never lie. Meanwhile men are being locked up for crimes they didn't commit just because some psychopath women...

My OP spoke nothing about any conspiracies. It's an engineering evaluation that myself, my class mates and my teachers done at the time. There was no politics that effected our conclusion. Only physics and engineering. It's true that steel doesn't need to reach melting point for it to loose...

While it's true that the jet fuel would not melt the steel into molten liquid, it would still get steel hot enough for it to warp very easily. Steel melts at around 1500c. Jet fuel burns at about 1000c. Steel starts to weaken at about 500c But the steel columns are encased in concrete to...

These short videos are fantastic Glory be to God

Well explained. Natural selection exists. It's survival of the fittest. But it only eliminates species. It cannot create species. Charles Darwin observed two types of finches in the Galapagos islands. One had a short beak and one had a long beak. Years later when he returned the ones with the...

Ah pretty awesome. Not many animals can grow a body part. Salamanders can do it too

I've watched many videos trying to explain how those buildings collapsed. Some condradict themselves but none of them make any sense to me and leave many questions open such as why thermite was found everywhere, that can only come from explosives. Maybe it was a terrosrist attack but I still...

LoL... Resorting to slander... Again... That's all you have my friend... It reveals much about yourself and your erroneous belief... Much love and God bless...

You repeatedly called me, my class mates and teachers ignorant. For a Christian your age you really should be doing better than to resort to personal attacks. Yes really. I never once called you any names or resorted to slander like you did to me No. I refuted your mainstream explanation...

My op is an engineering perspective but I don't mind discussing the logistics, motives and other parts of it all. He was simply saying that it would of been hard to do. I agreed but also said it's still very possible. Like why did the government lie about it? It would of been easier for them...

My friend, maybe you felt belittled because I did a good job of refuting your claims, but I never slandered you. Your post was slanderous. My post was respectful. I addressed all of your points. You haven't addressed any of my points.

I'm sorry Sir but I never called you ignorant or resorted to any kind of personal attack or used any kind of slur as you did to me, my colleagues and teachers. My response was respectfully written.