Search results

He accuses me of belittling him. But his repeatedly used the term, ignorant, to describe me and everyone else who questions his theory. I've always turned the other cheek and never called him any names. So it's like his kicked me in the groin repeatedly. I've turned the other cheek over and...

Oh please that's not belittling. You admitted yourself you didn't calculate the physics. And your story of the bolts, iv heard that before, it's mainstream. I gave a very measured response considering you kept calling me ignorant again and again. I could of replied by calling you names but I...

I can't even watch it. It just breaks my heart to see all that suffering all for nothing, which ever way you look at it

I totally acknowledge that the steel around the area of impact would of got hot enough for it to loose strength. But the steel below the impact was not heat effected which is why I don't believe the buildings could collapse in a free fall onto its own footprint. Also building 7 was not hit by a...

That's a fair question While it is rare to have a plane hit a high rise building it has happened several times before. Here are some examples Some important facts to note - None of these incidents resulted the building free falling onto its own footprint - We must not forget that trade...

That's is true. A fire will weaken steel. But here are some important facts that need to be considered. - Only the steel in the floors impacted would weaken. Not the steel in the floors below. - A fire cannot melt steel but molten metal was found in the wreckage. - A building has never free...

Well explained

As a fellow engineer, I appreciate you sharing your thoughts on this topic and you signing the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, founded by Richard Gage. God bless

That's a decent question. One that I've asked myself along with many others. But as an engineer I can only really state what I know about the engineering side of things and speculate on these other things like motives, logistics and stuff. I know someone who is excellent at these kind of...

It's very relevant. It shows that you have NOT applied the physics yourself. You've only repeated what you've heard. I have applied the physics myself so I actually know the collapse defies physics, I'm not just relying what someone else is saying. In a doco I watched they said for computer...

We're you unhappy at my refutation of his arguments? Cos you gave it a sad face Maybe you didn't read it

An open fire can NOT melt steel. Not even with jet fuel. That's a metallurgical fact. Jet fuel burns at 1,000c Structural steel melts at 1,500c There should have been no molten steel in the wreckage but a lot of it was found The aluminium in the plane does not account for the amount of...

Some people just believe the mainstream and won't even listen to the opposing experts Others have a heavy political alignment and refuse to believe they can do anything wrong. But 3 things prove to me it was a demo job 1 - The physics tells us it was impossible for those buildings to free...

You watch the videos that you want to hear but not the opposing arguments. That's called confirmation bias. I've objectively listened to both sides of the argument

To label of of us all conspiracy theorists or ignorant is a poor excuse. These are architects and engineers. Professionals. Their case should be heard objectively instead of being dismissed as conspiracy theorists or ignorant. They don't do conspiracies they do engineering. Their findings are...

The point is that buildings have had much larger fires than that of the towers. Buildings fully engulfed in flames. Yet they didn't collapse. The fact that the fire was confined is exactly why it would not have come down all at once in a free fall, as only the steel in that area would of been...

Brother Pete. Great to see you engaging in other topics :gd

I'll answer your question Deb but I'd appreciate it if you answered the question that I previously asked you. Answer. Buildings require maintenance just like anything else does. So any company hired out to do so called maintenance could of easily taken demo charges into the buildings and set...

I've used terms like free fall or gravitational acceleration a fair bit on this thread. So I thought I'd explain what I mean by that. I'm talking about the force of gravity and how it acts on an object. Gravity will accelerate an object at 9.8m/s2 (meters per second square). What does that...

@Wrangler Just a bit more info. When I was studying engineering in 2001 we obtained specifications for the towers. Their mass, the material used, amount of colums, tensile strength, etc. With that info we did the physics with help from our teachers, we crunched the numbers and we concluded...