Search results

As you're aware, there are none who, having looked through the Bible and been enlightened through the Spirit, subscribe to your interpretation.

Who in post-apostolic recognized Christian orthodoxy subscribes to this interpretation?

Matthew 24 1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown...

In John 2:19-22, Jesus predicts what would occur at His Resurrection. The literal temple of His Body would rise from the dead. And It did. Nothing whatever to do with 70 AD. In Matthew 24:1-2, Jesus predicts what would occur in 70 AD. The literal stones of the temple buildings would be thrown...

I asked the question first. Answer mine first, then I'll answer yours.

Did John 2:19-22 take place in the Olivet discourse?

OK rwb blessings to you as well.

Matthew 27 52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. They were physical appearances.

What other than Jerusalem was known as the holy city? Nothing required that.

What took you so long? :laughing: Ignore lists are for losers whose cultic psychoses can't stand up to literal Scriptural scrutiny. Keep that "discernment" coming. :laughing:

Yes, Daniel was "a secular historian who is not even Christian". Keep that "discernment" coming. :laughing:

Awaiting your response to my post 145. :laughing:

Matthew 27:53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. It was referred to as the holy city even after Jesus' resurrection.

Of course the People of God spiritually discern, and are spiritually discerned. But the AOD spoken of by Daniel (Daniel 9:26,27) and Jesus, is corroborated and identified in the Matthew 24:15 parallel synoptic verse of Luke 21:20: "And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then...

His gnosis psychosis confused him. :laughing:

If there is no temple other than the People of God, then what is the obvious Scriptural conclusion?

Who are you talking to?

Them in Judaea fled prior to 70 AD when they saw Jerusalem compassed with armies (Luke 21:20). The Judaeans didn't see any AoD set up on the temple mount, because the armies were the AoD (synoptic parallel verses Luke 21:20; Matthew 24:15) whom they saw, and from whom they fled, well before the...

Amen. The Kingdom of God indwells the People of God (Luke 17:21) who together comprise the Temple of God (Ephesians 2:21,22; 1 Peter 2:5). There is no other temple.

The Judaean Christians' flight occurred prior to 70 AD. Were they guilty of "preterism heresy"? :laughing: