Search results

Yeah. But as we see, historical fact is anathema to gnostic psychosis. So we instead get typical cultic responses of evasion and obfuscation. Sad indeed.

List all of the non-Olivet instances of non-literal Judaea in NT Scripture. Waiting.

Waiting.

So the evasive squirming begins. :laughing: :laughing: Just satisfy the request. List all of the non-Olivet instances of non-literal Judaea in NT Scripture. Couldn't be more simple. Waiting.

List all of the non-Olivet instances of non-literal Judaea in NT Scripture.

Why did "them which are in Judaea" flee over a physical escape route? Were they willfully blind? :laughing:

Yes, you're absolutely correct. The term “Judaean Christians” only ever refers exclusively to that unique genetic subspecies with Judaean hair, Judaean eyes, Judaean noses, Judaean mouths, Judaean arms, Judaean legs, Judaean fingers, Judaean toes, Judaean skin, and Judaean organs. It could...

He agrees in post 102 that he denies them. Thus he denies that the Olivet discourse spoke of a literal temple, literal Judaean Christians, a literal invasion by literal Roman armies, the literal destruction of literal Jerusalem, et al. In short, he believes that it spoke of nothing literal...

@TribulationSigns denies all of that.

I agree with virtually all of that. Just wanted to confirm that you recognize that 70 AD was both a physical and spiritual reality for which Messiah had a purpose, and whose predictive events He described in His Olivet discourse. @TribulationSigns will be livid. :laughing:

When do you plan to start telling it? :laughing:

Your responses go straight into the round file from whence they come. :laughing:

FYI Lizbeth, the man is a fanatical gnostic who hyperspiritualizes every word that he lays eyes on. It's impossible to carry on a rational conversation with him.

You might as well quit wasting bytes. We all already know what you believe. I'm waiting to hear from @rwb.

That's been debunked innumerable times. The Bible translations to which you refer were all written by Reformation scholars during the Reformation era, when they were being persecuted and martyred by the antichrist of the apostate papacy. No Reformer ever heard of a mythical "rapturized" departure.

I fully concur. But did Jesus make any reference in His Olivet discourse to what would occur between then and 70 AD?

I too...

Does your gnosis need to rest? :laughing:

Your "doctrine" is pure gnosis. What does gnosis believe about 70 AD?

What does gnosis debate?