Search results

Your dispensationalized delusions demonstrated. :laughing:

There is not one instance of support for your claims, in the entirety of pre-19th-century historical Christian orthodoxy. Not one. Your claims are modernist revisionist heterodoxy. Naught else.

Daniel 9 24 Seventy weeks are determined... That's all seventy, including the seventieth. Your seventieth is detached, decapitated, and ophaned, the epitome of undetermined. It is a denial and rejection of Daniel's declaration and affirmation: Seventy weeks are determined... I'll take...

I fully concur. I'd been replying to @Nameaboveallnames and you supplied the additional relevant detail. I showed that even simple basic standard grammar itself establishes the "He's" of verse 27 as Messiah the Prince. Thanks.

Daniel's grammar is better than yours. :laughing: There's no reference to a "Roman" prince. That's your imagination. Titus was under the command and control of Messiah the Prince. The "he's" in verse 27 do not refer to Titus, contrary to your malinterpretation. :laughing: Titus did not...

Standard grammar. "he" in Daniel 9:27 requires a preceding referent/antecedent which matches the number (i.e. singular) and the gender (i.e. male). The preceding referent/antecedent which matches the number (i.e. singular) and the gender (i.e. male) is "prince" in Daniel 9:26. "prince" in...

2 Thessalonians 2 3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth...

Daniel 9 25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. 26 And after...

Can't find Christopher Columbus in Scripture!

Poor Duped Deceived Davy (again) and his strawified hallucinations. :laughing: No Reformer has ever believed what he alleges. Rather, the Reformers recognized and proclaimed that the apostate papacy of their time was the prevailing antichrist of their time. This proclamation rocked the...

The antichrist of the apostate papacy began to manifest itself centuries before the Reformation. Then God raised up the Reformers to recognize, confront, and overcome it.

The Reformers, whom God raised up to liberate His True Church from the spiritual oppression of the apostate papacy, used the wisdom and discernment that God gave them to correctly identify antichrist. They were smarter than you. :laughing:

In Scripture, history, and grammar, the prince that shall come of Daniel 9:26 is Messiah the Prince of Daniel 9:25, i.e. Christ. Christ becomes antichrist only blasphemously.

Ten historical Roman horns (kingdoms) which arose out of the fourth beast/kingdom of the Roman empire, and their first or early kings: Heruli - Anthyrius I Suevi - Hermeric Burgundians - Gjúki Huns - Attila Ostrogoths - Theodoric Visigoths - Alaric I Vandals - Genseric Lombards - Lethuc Franks...

1st and 2nd John.

You've said you believe in a futurized antichrist, so that's no strawman, unless you've decided to renounce it. I simply informed you of its Jesuit origin. What's with "RCC members"? They're your strawmen. To this point, this discussion has been about the historical apostate papacy and the...

So you believe that the Reformation should have embraced the blasphemies of the apostate papacy. So you believe the Jesuit futurized antichrist of the apostate papacy's counter-reformation. My theological understanding recognizes the legitimacy and accuracy of the Reformation's theological...

Why do you have no interest in the above? You've claimed that the Reformation "demonized" the RCC. What alternative reaction to the papal blasphemies above would you consider appropriate? Did the RCC demonize the Reformation? Would being burned at the stake qualify as demonization? I'm a...

Please cite the Books, Chapters, and Verses of Scriptures which present the following: “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De...

Yes, blasphemy is merely a red herring. :laughing: The only red herring is your refusal to answer a simple question. Thanks for your confirmation of your acceptance of papal blasphemies. And thank God for the Reformers and the Reformation, whom God raised up to deliver His True Church from...