Search results

Revelation 2:17 17 ο εχων ους ακουσατω τι το πνευμα λεγει ταις εκκλησιαις τω νικωντι δωσω αυτω του μαννα του κεκρυμμενου και δωσω αυτω ψηφον λευκην και επι την ψηφον ονομα καινον γεγραμμενον ο ουδεις οιδεν ει μη ο λαμβανων _______. Revelation 19:12 12 οι δε οφθαλμοι αυτου φλοξ πυρος και επι...

Were Canaanite kings anointed at their coronations? Back to inheritance: regarding the decree quoted in Acts 13:33 and what I said about it, (which you at least said that it was a possibility). Acts 13:32-34 32 And we bring you good tidings of the promise made unto the fathers, 33 that Elohim...

I see now that what you are doing here is probably the best tactic you have: just keep repeating the same nonsense and assuming or outright making a plethora of false insinuations-accusations until everyone who disagrees with you gives up and walks away. If you actually think I am still reading...

The scripture does that already and it has been shown to you from two Psalms.

That's why I keep trying to explain to you that the Logos is the one-of-a-kind Son. When are you going to actually read and understand what I am writing? Of course, because the Logos is Elohim, the Word of the Father: so the Father raised up the Meshiah because the Spirit of the Father, His...

I also note you keep spewing lies and am now getting bored with it again.

As previously stated: no, I don't. Again, the decree of Psalm 2:7 was spoken to the Meshiah, a man, born of a woman, of the seed of David according to the flesh. I believe the scripture, all of it: what I do not believe are your fantasy doctrines such as that the Father thought it was too...

John 1:1-5, Hebrews 7:1-3, for starters. The Meshiah, a man, and the Spirit that was in him raised him from the dead, Rom 8:11. Lol. They are not my articles: that's simply the Greek text of the Apostolic writings. And where have I said that? Quote the post or please stop lying. It...

Nope, I did not claim what you say I claimed: my claim was that the Psa 2:7 decree was spoken to the Meshiah in the Matthew and Luke Gospel accounts. That is unacceptable for you because you desperately need Rom 1:4 to confirm your theory about the Psa 2:7 decree having been spoken to the...

Nope, the dating of the Apocalypse by modern scholars, (circa 95-96AD), is based almost completely on the fabricated RCC story about "Antipas the martyr". The Apocalypse was also originally written in Hebrew and completed in the days leading up to the beheading of Yohanne. The "book of life of...

Nope, you're wrong, I have no problem with the opening context because , as I said, it speaks of the Anointed One, a man. Hebrews 1:1 1 πολυμερως και πολυτροπως παλαι ο θεος λαλησας τοις πατρασιν εν τοις προφηταις επ εσχατου των ημερων τουτων ελαλησεν ημιν εν υιω εν υιω ~ in a Son Do you...

Hebrews 1:5 says nothing about the resurrection, and in fact quotes a second passage found in the scripture, strongly implying that the Psa 2:7 quote is supposed to also be in the scripture, in the Gospel accounts, where the Father indeed spoke that decree to the Meshiah-Anointed One. The author...

That is not it. This nomen sacrum is two Greek letters combined, the Iota, (Ι), and the Eta, (Η), with an overstrike to form the sacred name Ι̅Η, (nomen sacrum is Latin for sacred name and is not my invention, nomina sacra is simply the plural, sacred names). If you return to the source text...

Where have I said that? Where did you get "Jesus Christ" from? That consists of two nomina sacra, (sacred names), which were interpreted by the RCC a very long time ago. Why has no one ever questioned their interpretations of the nomina sacra? Why are you taught from traditions of men instead of...

It seems to me that most end up making their own God these days. As for myself: the Father, YHWH Elohim Almighty of the Hebrews and of Yisrael. And to know Him and His Word whom He has sent is life eternal.

You're now just showing yourself a liar again.

Again, I haven't said that there was a "pre-existent Christ", that's your game, and it's a stupid one: and it is equally as stupid to keep asking me to prove something I never said. Have you no reading comprehension whatsoever? NO, I DID NOT SAY THAT RUACH ELOHIM IS CHRIST. CHRIST WAS A MORTAL...

The Son has life in himself because he is the Logos-Word of the Father, so of course the Father gave His Son to have Life in himself also. Did you never read the parable of the sower? The seed is the Logos, which is Living. I haven't said that there was a "pre-existent Christ", that's your game...

That isn't really off topic at all. 1 Samuel 16:11-13 KJV 11 And Samuel said unto Jesse, Are here all thy children? And he said, There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said unto Jesse, Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither. 12...