Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    Once again thanks for such a great example of how absolutely wrong it is to search for a text by quote mining to find something you can rip from its context to say something ridiculous and entirely against what the scripture actually says. Acts 2:13-15 13 But others mocking said, They are...
  2. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    Amen, Meshiah is the neos-new Mediator of the kainos-renewed covenant: for Mosheh was the former Mediator. However you will not win this argument by what is currently in the Greek texts because the grammar rules support how it is rendered in most translations. It can only be supported at this...
  3. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    Excellent, people who understand and believe this are few and far between. It's proven in the parable of the wine-skins and how neos and kainos are employed by the Master therein. Wine-skins were made primarily with goat skins, (but whether or not so isn't important, that's just how it was). The...
  4. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    We have been over this too, and this passage does not say "the Law of Moses", which you added to it, and the reason it does not say that is because it is speaking about the law as interpreted by the Pharisees, Sadducees, Chief Priests, Elders, Scribes, and the Sanhedrin: their own handwritten...
  5. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    So you've extracted all of that out of one verse, John 7:22, separated from its context, and yet ignored everything I've just previously posted from the scripture refuting your understanding of circumcision. John 7:14-26 ASV 14 But when it was now the midst of the feast Jesus went up into the...
  6. dak

    John 6 Was Jesus speaking literally

    I quoted from the Torah, and there are no debates, discrepancies, or contentions between scholars regarding the text which I quoted as far as I know. You either take it as authoritative and believe it or you do not. Choose Life. :clmSmlx
  7. dak

    John 6 Was Jesus speaking literally

    Perhaps you and your church should take the following scripture a little more authoritatively: Leviticus 17:10-14 KJV 10 And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, that eateth any manner of blood; I will even set my face against that soul...
  8. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    Your confusion is on you for lack of Torah knowledge and neither believing the Master nor Paul. Deuteronomy 10:16 KJV 16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked. Deuteronomy 30:1-6 KJV 1 And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee...
  9. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    Please stop lying. I said no such thing and actually said the opposite: but you do not believe Paul. Your own mind is deceiving you because you cannot imagine that you yourself might be wrong. Again, for the umpteenth time: Romans 7:14 14 For we know that the Torah is spiritual: but I am...
  10. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    That's another reason I see that this will not likely be fruitful: all of your wildly false accusations which you never have any evidence for. Moreover, as for the rest of your posts, a do not plan to answer three or four in a row from you: it's ridiculous and you surely know that it takes much...
  11. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    His people are added to His olive tree one at a time: therefore Paul says: Galatians 3:24 ASV 24 So that the law is become [has become] our tutor to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. We've been over this too, extensively, and this among the many other things you now...
  12. dak

    The Law 430 years later did not...

    True, but neither does the covenant with Abraham nullify the Torah penned by Mosheh just because it came 430 years later. The promised seed, Yitzhak, is Meshiah even according to Paul: Abraham therefore did receive that promise, and moreover, the righteousness accounted to Abraham in Gen 15:6...
  13. dak

    Songs of the Scroll

    1 John 1:1-3 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life: 2 And the life was rendered apparent, and we have clearly discerned, and bear witness, and announce to you...
  14. dak

    Songs of the Scroll

    Isaiah 40:6-8 KJV 6 The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh is grass, and all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field: 7 The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: because the spirit of the LORD bloweth upon it: surely the people is grass. 8 The grass withereth...
  15. dak

    Songs of the Scroll

    Tehillim-Psalms 40:1-6 1 For the End, A Psalm of David. Waiting, I waited (patiently) on YHWH, and He inclined unto me, and heard my cry. 2 And He has brought me up from the pit of desolation, out of the miry clay, and has set my feet upon the Rock and has established my steps. 3 He has put a...
  16. dak

    Logos Logic

    Tehillim-Psalms 118 [01] Give thanks to YHWH for His goodness, for His kindness into olam. [02] Let Yisrael now say, For His kindness into olam! [03] Let the house of Aharon now say, For His kindness into olam! [04] Let those fearing YHWH now say, For His kindness into olam! [05] I called on YAH...
  17. dak

    John 1:1 and Jesus’ Sonship in Adoptionist thought

    Fair enough, there is a little more evidence earlier in the sermon, but it is not conclusive, so I'll leave it at that.
  18. dak

    John 1:1 and Jesus’ Sonship in Adoptionist thought

    I see that as a clause or break in the context which then reverts right back to the discussion concerning the rising from the dead. Two important similarly employed words are at play, G1453 ἐγείρω, (egeiro), and G450 ἀνίστημι, (anistemi), and I believe they mark a slight, temporary diversion...
  19. dak

    John 1:1 and Jesus’ Sonship in Adoptionist thought

    This discussion was prompted in another thread which the OP and I did not want to hijack, and it was concerning a comment I made about John 1:1 in that thread, and therefore that is why I started with John 1:1. However I also wholeheartedly agree with your statement here because you can still...
  20. dak

    John 1:1 and Jesus’ Sonship in Adoptionist thought

    This following is a little ahead of where I would like to be at this point but that's okay. Nomina Sacra Key (for the three case forms of Θεος found herein) Θ̅Ϲ — Θεος, Θεοτης, (Col 2:9), Θειος, (Acts 17:29), Θειοτης, (Rom 1:20) Θ̅Ν — Θεον, Θειον, (Exo 31:3, Exo 35:31, Prov 2:17, Acts 17:29)...