Search results

Hebrew words in the Gospel of John: 1) Kepha, (Greek transliteration: κηφας), from H3710 Keph. John 1:42 ASV 42 He brought him unto Jesus. Jesus looked upon him, and said, Thou art Simon the son of John: thou shalt be called Cephas (which is by interpretation, Peter). [or Stone, or a Stone]...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shield_of_the_Trinity Note: The Son is not in the bosom of the Father in the image file. This is a tripartite, (three part), God: for one without the other two is not fully God, for the fourth God in the center is the only full God. The Son is not the Father, nor...

Thanks for asking, and for the invite, HT. First there are some important and necessary preliminary thoughts to begin with. As for Arius, the so-called early fourth century heretic, one cannot truly know for sure what all he actually believed, for he was apparently poisoned, and then most all...

Start a thread about John 1:1 in this board, (Apologetics Forum), and I will answer that thread, at least concerning what I spoke about above, (and I should say, Elohim willing, I will answer, (ya never know)).

ALL of my posts, (including threads), are ultimately according to my understanding of the scripture: Adoptionism. Even John 1:1 is a can of worms that proves Trinitarianism preaches at least two Gods and it is proven by their own Greek grammar rules and in their own lexicons, (and I am probably...

Resources yes, go directly to "The Bible", the original source, as my understanding of Adoptionism did not come from men: but remember, a Bible that is copyrighted is the corrupted property of thieves and robbers using the Word of Elohim to make huge profits in the form of filthy lucre...

BOTH of the following responses were to you: Why should I have answered you the third time a couple of days ago when you did not hear the first two times? And you wonder why you are now essentially being ignored?

So then, you are not a Trinitarian? That's the most influential doctrine to have come forth from the womb of the RCC.

In the two quotes to follow Paul is quoting not from the Hebrew text but from the OG-LXX, (Old Greek Septuagint). There are many places in the OG LXX where the Tetragrammaton is actually divided at the waw, producing Yah, which would have appeared that way in the Paleo Hebrew text but do not now...

Ephesians 4:7-13 7 But unto each one of us was the grace given according to the measure of the gift of the Χ̅Ρ. 8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended on high, he led captivity captive, And gave gifts unto men. [Psa 68:18] 9 Now this, "He ascended", what is it but that he also descended into the...

Yeshayah-Isaiah 38:9-11 TS2009 9 This is the writing of Ḥizqiyahu sovereign of Yehuḏah, when he had been sick and had recovered from his sickness: 10 I said, “Am I to go into the gates of She’ol in the prime of my life? Shall I be deprived of the rest of my years?” 11 I said, “I shall not see...

And once again you apparently did not understand: yes, my words directed back to you, who chooses to harbor the gall of bitterness in his heart. Now do you understand? You supposedly know the scripture so well but you cannot recognize ellipsis in everyday language? If harboring the gall of...

If you would have listened, and if you had believed all the scripture that has been quoted up to now, (and at least have understood the points that have been made, (whether you agreed with them or not)), you might almost be at the point where you might start to begin understanding all these...

To those who may be interested: please understand that whenever anyone disagrees with HT's paradigm, which he has foisted onto the scripture, he then feels he has the right to accuse that person of not believing the scripture, or the passage he has mangled, or as in this case, accusing me of...

In your wild imagination: but if the gall of bitterness is what floats your boat, that's on you. I am only adding this paragraph because Marks just posted the same passage to you again, which you have now essentially denied once again, and when I quoted that passage at the beginning of our...

My initial reply matches the passage perfectly. First, the Yhudim of the passage take the words of the Master literally-physically, and therefore chose death, (again, Deut 30:19), and thus they are offended: but what does Peter say at the end of the discussion? John 6:66-69 KJV 66 From that...

I am simply strongly suggesting that John was likely also written in either Hebrew or Aramaic just as was Matthew. There are logical reason for this, for example Kepha is either Hebrew or Aramaic, and the same is true with "Messias" employed several times in the Gospel of John, and which appears...

Most likely this Gospel also was written in either Hebrew or Aramaic, (like Matthew), and thus the answer would be that he would have said the same exact thing. The reason why is the same as the following warning from Mosheh about how we read and understand what the scripture sets before us...

No matter how much you wish to change the subject matter it is too late: the point of the thread has already been proven. Did you read the link at the bottom of the OP? Whenever Paul uses the idiom works of the law, he is not speaking of the Torah, rather, for anyone understanding the things...

False insinuation: I said nothing about the Roman Catholic, or Catholic church, or their teachings on Peter and their Popes. Moreover if you knew the scripture you would have recognized that the immersion I spoke of was foretold by the Master himself, in John 21:18-19, (an immersion into death...