Search results

I didn't change the subject, I gave an explanation of all that would not be if Zechariah 12-14 had not already happened. Which would mean cutting out much of the New Testament. But why do you resort to making it personal? And why do you cling to time, and reject any explanation? Time is of this...

That is how this works. If you actually knew the scriptures you would know that. So, no, context is God's alone to do with what He wills, not to be judged by men who don't even know that Christ and the apostles did the same thing.

You have judged me because what I have told you does not agree with what you believe. Many things that are false can seemingly agree with other scripture--but that is not the test. It is the Spirit that reveals what is true and is judged by no man as you have done. I have come saying nothing but...

That statement is the crux of the problem for you. For it is written, "But whatever is given you in that hour, speak that; for it is not you who speak, but the Holy Spirit."

Acts 17:11 These were more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so. Acts 17:11 doesn't help you, it shows your shortfall. And the other passages do not apply to those...

@all So...there were no "false teachers" spreading "destructive heresies", no "strong delusion" and no "lie" and "the spirit of anti-Christ" was not "already at work" 2,000 years ago, Jesus did not "overcome the world", "all authority in heaven and earth" was not given to Him, the cross was not...

This is I AM in those who are His, it's what we are.

Yes, but the point is the same: The war that some say is still yet to come, is over. To deny this, is to deny Jesus' complete victory...that all is not paid in full, but that there is still a battle ahead.

I have answered already, but you have denied it and seek more because you still do not believe. That is all on you.

If you think that Jesus rebuked those who rejected Him by "clear evidence already before them"--the same will be required of you...and you have already failed, for you had more evidence than they. And yes, it is insolence to deny more than they were given. That is what you have proven.

Rebuke, warning, and mocking are determined by who is correct, and "proof" is not required as you require of me...but is a good indication who is correct.

Who is refusing who, depends on who is correct, and your reference to what others believe is no defense.

I have listened nothing I merely "believe." If you don't the time to go back and reread what we already covered--stop asking and pay more attention when we are covering things. But if you are going to accuse me of accusing the Holy spirit, know that you accuse the Holy spirit of being me--and...

I just did explain what actually happened, you quoted me here above. Typical, you deny what I have said as if I never said it. As for Revelation and every eye shall see--what do you think I have been telling you? We shall all see, for we hall see Him as He is, for we shall be like Him--which is...

"Ethereal"--that is your reference to heaven. Typical. Sad. Very sad.

You just quoted me explaining which doctrines, but still you deny it. Typical.

Jesus has returned and continues to return ("but each on in his own order" as it is written), "in the glory of the Father" whom is spirit, but you deny it. Typical.

If it is given to me to clarify as God has done many times, you are only typical in your response by not knowing any better. It means nothing more than you fall into a repeated pattern.

I referred to the scriptures. If you don't know well enough to recognize that, you speak against the truth I have quoted. But, sure, many are heaven bound in spite of false teachings--I said that.

You should have understood that to be the Holy Land, it was not of this world. But yes, God has brought them back--with Him, in Him.