Search results

I completely concur. So the Darby/Scofield/Jesuit crowd, which espouses number 2 claiming that the Covenant Confirmer is a future Antichrist, is at blasphemous variance with unequivocal Scripture. The Covenant was Confirmed at Calvary. Couldn't be more plain. Note that the Covenant is with...

Scripture interprets Scripture and identifies the AOD in Luke 21:20. It was the Roman armies.

The beliefs of those who reject Christ are at enmity with the beliefs of those who are in Christ. Soliciting the former is a waste of time for any Christian.

Acts 13 27 For they that dwell at Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they knew Him not, nor yet the voices of the prophets which are read every sabbath day, they have fulfilled them in condemning Him. Paul doesn't share your affinity for "they that dwell at Jerusalem".

What to believe? 1. Messiah the Prince, who confirmed the covenant, is the Christ. or 2. Messiah the Prince, who confirmed the covenant, is the Antichrist. Who needs a hint?

The Talmud is the most vital manuscript of conventional Judaism. Maybe you should make time. Jesus refers to it: Mark 7 13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

Fantasized in modernist Darby/Scofield/Jesuit delusionism as the Antichrist. Not in historic orthodox Christian eschatology. Why didn't you ask him what Talmudism is? Or don't you yourself know?

This is a Christian forum. Whatever your Jewish rabbis are anticipating is of utter irrelevance to the born-again Child of God in Christ. There's no such thing as Judaism. What your Jewish rabbis practise is kabbalistic Babylonian talmudism, a blasphemous pharisaic antichristian occultic...

Complete utter modernist Darby/Scofield/Jesuit apostate blasphemous futurized fantasy, fallacy, delusion and deception. The grammar of Scripture stands. The content of Scripture stands. There is not one example of the advocacy of blasphemy in 17 centuries of historical orthodox Christianity...

The connecting words "Messiah the Prince" in Daniel 9:25 qualify the term as the legitimate grammatical referent of Daniel 9:26. There is only one Person identified as a Prince throughout Daniel 9:24-27, and He is Messiah the Prince, the prince who did come. The claim that Messiah the Prince...

The referent of "Messiah" in Daniel 9:26 is "Messiah the Prince" in Daniel 9:25. The connector is "Messiah". The referent of "prince" in Daniel 9:26 is "Messiah the Prince" in Daniel 9:25. The connector is "Prince". There can't be different referents, because the referent of Daniel 9:26 is...

If you actually have such a post, copy/paste it here, or link to it. And describe how a "compound, complex, sentence" invalidates referents.

Go present your argument to the Holy Spirit and Daniel, who inspired and wrote the prophecy. Tell us what they say. :laughing:

Why didn't you demonstrate the "(mis)understanding of grammar rules"? Awaiting. :laughing:

You're substituting your subjective interpretations for the objective rules of grammar. The objective rules of grammar must be satisfied before considering subjective interpretations. Get the priorities right. Messiah was the prince who did come, some 500 years after Daniel's prophecy. The...

Applying simple grade-school grammar: The grammatical referent of "he" in verse 27 is "prince" in verse 26. The grammatical referent of "prince" in verse 26 is "Messiah the Prince" in verse 25. Therefore, grammatically, "he" in verse 27 is "Messiah the Prince".

Only for the deceived and deluded.

Knowledge and name recognition. For the undeceived.

God does not bless the Israel who continues to reject His Son. That is by far most of Israel today. Jesus said they were of their father the devil.

Orthodox Jews who accept Christ forsake their talmudism. They become Christians, new creations in Christ.