Search results

"That last great "anitchrist"" is a fabricated futurized fantasy spawned in the Jesuit counter-reformation of the apostasized papacy. It is today a legacy of dispensationalized delusion and deception.

Eusebius is the acclaimed Father of Church History. You're not. :laughing: You believe that everything before 70 AD was preterist. Therefore, you believe that Jesus was preterist. :laughing:

They fled long ago, before 70 AD. Father of Church History Eusebius: The people of the Church in Jerusalem were commanded by an oracle given by revelation before the war to those in the city who were worthy of it to depart and dwell in one of the cities of Perea which they called Pella. To it...

Daniel 2 44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. Jesus was already reigning since...

Historicism is the eschatology of the Protestant Reformers. Futurism is the Jesuit spawn of the apostate papacy's counter-reformation. You're the swallower. :laughing:

A couple of rabbinical insights for premils: “It is very clear that we see in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he is fulfilling his destiny as Moshiach ben Yosef, that is to say, the reincarnation of Jonathan,” Rabbi Sudri told Breaking Israel News ... “The name ‘Netanyahu’ (נתניהו) is...

You certainly do deny it. Because you weren't there! :laughing:

They don't believe the psychoses of fantasy futurites. How many times would you like to be told? So you don't believe Nehemiah and Isaiah? Or Matthew? Matthew 4:5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, Matthew 27:53 And came out of the...

Jesus' warning was Biblical. Its fulfillment was historical. I believe both. You believe neither. I believe Biblical and historical. Every time. Not futurized fantasy.

Luke 21:20 interprets Matthew 24:15 to identify the AoD, which was the Roman armies, who were advancing upon the holy place of Jerusalem, the holy city (Nehemiah 11:1; Isaiah 52:1).

Yeah, I'd been unable to recall the name until you referenced it. Any claim to be the sole possessor of truth is trademark cultism, and this one certainly qualifies by that criterion. The ignorance and repudiation of the faith, vision, and sacrifice of the historical orthodox Christian Church...

You're espousing your own historically vacuous hallucinations in order to attempt to justify your futurized fantasies and fallacies. Who has said anything about "Roman's army already in the temple in Jerusalem"? Not I. That is classic dispensational delusion, and you're one of the gullible...

The context which you espouse is strictly your own, as there is not one recognized historical orthodox Christian expositor who subscribes to it. All recognize references relating to the destruction of Jerusalem in Jesus' discourse. You haven't explained why the Judaean Christians fled (the...

You hadn't replied specifically to me in #152. For the definition of "generation" in Matthew 24, see #164. As rwb has explained, the judgment and punishment described by Jesus was directed at unbelieving Israel. The Christian believers fled and escaped. The generation was the ensuing 40...

Matthew 24:34 Greek 1074 [e] genea γενεὰ generation N-NFS "3. the whole multitude of men living at the same time: Matthew 24:34;"

Greetings RB; glad that there is something that we can agree upon. The context is the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. An event of this significance would not possibly go unprophesied. The destruction of Jerusalem encompassed both physical and spiritual realities, as I believe that I've...

The literal destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD was essential to accomplish no less than two of God's purposes. Physically, to visit physical judgment and destruction by God upon the nation which had rejected His Son, and to obliterate all obsolete physical vestiges of the abolished old covenant...

Josephus didn't write the books of Matthew and Luke. :laughing: You'll have to try again.

You've been repeatedly telling us that you believe that Scripture interprets Scripture. I agree. So Luke 21:20 interprets Matthew 24:15 to identify the abomination of desolation. It was the Roman armies. So let Scripture interpret Scripture.

I say and infer nothing. Scripture itself identifies the "abomination of desolation". Nothing to do with an "IDOL". Matthew 24 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand) 16 Then...