Search results

Hey Marty, Jesus sits at the right hand of God until His enemies are made His footstool. If Jesus remains in heaven in Revelation 19 then what you’re saying would make sense. If Jesus leaves heaven to fight His enemies in Revelation 19 then that looks like He doesn’t remain seated at the right...

That’s a good question. I’ve looked at this before and what I see is the “one taken and the other left” phase could possibly be interpreted as one received the message and one didn’t. The word taken, or shall be taken, is <3880> paralambano. One of the definitions of that word from Thayer’s...

Well if their not then how can Zechariah 14:11 be true before the current earth is destroyed? Zechariah 14:11 And men shall dwell in it, and there shall be no more utter destruction; but Jerusalem shall be safely inhabited.

It appears you have the current earth and heavens lasting forever, but in a cleansed or transformed into a perfect physical state in the future. Would you agree that a spiritual perfect state happened at the cross and that is depicted as the heavenly Jerusalem in verses such as Hebrews 12:22...

Ok, in Revelation 21:1 it says And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. Wouldn’t this mean that the earthly Jerusalem does see destruction when the first heaven and first earth pass away? Keep in mind Zechariah...

One thing I have observed about Zechariah 14 is that it talks about both the earthly Jerusalem and new Jerusalem but it never makes the distinction between the two, it just calls them both Jerusalem. Zechariah 14:2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be...

All I can say is that I’m praying for you brother.

Can you not see yourself? In this thread, in post#600, you claimed people who believed the earth was flat were stupid because they should’ve made observations of the moon. That is, observations outside of the Bible. I just quoted you saying this … “Do you get truth from scripture or from...

Here’s your posts …

You did the very same thing just a few days ago. You made the very same kind of argument that you said made people look stupid in the past. I would say you need to just stop doing that.

I see it as you referring to anyone who would ignore evidence outside of the Bible, such as observations of the moon, as being stupid. You yourself have made that very same argument about the flood being global, do I need to quote you again? I just applied the very same accusation to you, for...

I’m going there because you are arguing that people who thought the earth was flat were stupid because they didn’t make observations of the moon and that it was round. Likewise it seems stupid to ignore the geological evidence that the flood was local. It’s the same thing, the same argument.

And likewise those who see the flood as a local event see you as stupid.

The word circle is <2329> chug. Here’s a short list of verses that speak about the corners of the earth … Job 37:3, Isaiah 11:12, Isaiah 41:9, Revelation 7:1, Revelation 20:8. We know in the past that there were some people in the church that argued that the earth was flat and they got that...

Maybe the nations that the Lord fights against are Sodom and Egypt. Revelation 11:8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Alright, here’s the reality, all of us, Premil, Amill, and preterist, use secular information when looking at the Bible. Is the earth flat? Well the church use to think so based solely on Biblical verses. The overwhelming amount of secular information points to a spherical earth, so much so...

There wasn’t a global flood. Hello? I only brought up secular history to confirm the flood was local. There is, it’s all in the Bible. The Bible doesn’t teach Amill, as you understand it. ———————————- Do you see how your own arguments fall apart when they can be used against you? There...

You didn’t stutter but you said there is no evidence in scripture of Jesus returning in 70AD. And I can use that same argument and say there no verses that talk about a global flood. It’s only your false interpretation of those verses. I rely on scripture also, I can also point out that there...

What are you talking about? There are multiple verses that point to a soon, near, at the door, coming of Christ. It appears you are relying on secular evidence to say a coming didn’t happen in the first century and therefore the verses that talk about a soon coming need to be interpreted in...

Here is what you said to me in another thread just a few days ago … Here’s your argument now … Can you tell us if you get your truth from scripture or from secular sources when it comes to a soon coming of Jesus?