Search results

Compression problem? No — you’re the one choking on Scofield’s fumes. Let’s break this down like adults who can read a full sentence in context. Romans 11 does not say ethnic Jews are saved because they’re Jews. It says: “They were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do...

You just compared quoting Jesus to Satan in the desert. That says everything we need to know. :oops: Here’s the real irony: You’re accusing others of “twisting Scripture” while completely skipping the plain, repeated words of Jesus Christ Himself: “Immediately after the tribulation of those...

You just called Romans 11 a “billboard,” but apparently you’re driving past it at 90mph, eyes closed, with Scofield’s bumper stickers blocking the windshield. Let’s make this real simple: Hebrews 9:28 “To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time…” Second. Time. Not 2.5. Not...

You’re not teaching the Gospel. You’re teaching a Disney+ end-times fairytale with Scofield as your writer/producer. Let me be painfully clear for every lurker still trapped in this delusion: There is one Bride. One Groom. One covenant. One resurrection. One return. All of it centered on...

Doug — what you’re preaching isn’t just confused, it’s a theological train wreck that tramples the blood of Christ and tries to stitch the torn veil back together with Scofield’s lies and flesh-based religion. You’re out here acting like Jesus didn’t establish the New Covenant — like His death...

You’ve woven together a patchwork of half-verses and human interpretations into an elaborate end-times fantasy that flatly contradicts the clear testimony of Jesus, Paul, and the apostles. Let’s get something straight: There is only ONE return of Christ — not two. Hebrews 9:28 says it plainly...

You say I dishonor God? No — you do. You dishonor Him by clinging to shadows after the substance has come. You dishonor the Cross by quoting stars and ordinances — while ignoring the One who bled beneath them. You exalt a nation that crucified the Son of God and dare call it “Israel” — while...

You say I have “strange ideas”? No. What’s strange is building a theology that craves the return of animal sacrifice after the blood of the Son of God was already spilled. What’s strange is believing the Spirit-filled Body of Christ should bow to a Christ-rejecting state built by global bankers...

You’re quoting Jeremiah as if the Old Covenant is still in effect — as if the New Covenant didn’t happen, or worse, didn’t fulfill what Jeremiah himself prophesied just four verses earlier: “Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel…” —...

Here’s the problem: Most of you don’t even know who or what "Israel" is. I’d testify to that in a court of law. And if there were a lie detector wired to an electric chair, I’d volunteer to sit in it — just to declare the truth that you have no clue what Israel actually is… and I’d walk away...

So let me get this straight: You’re claiming the words of Jesus — the Son of God, the King of the Jews, the Word made flesh — don’t apply to believers because He hadn’t died yet? That’s not sound doctrine. That’s Scofield-fueled delusion. You say, “The kingdom was being offered to Israel.”...

You say my soapbox doesn’t exist — but it was built by the One you claim to follow. “He who hears My words and does not do them is like a man who built his house on the sand... and great was the fall of it.” — Luke 6:49 The only “platform” that matters is the authority of Jesus Christ, and...

You say “not another name beside Jesus shall enter it” — and yet you reject His own words. You claim to follow the Bible, but deny the authority of the One who is the Word made flesh. That’s the contradiction. I mention Scofield not for fun, but because you’re parroting his system — a system...

So you're claiming the words of Jesus — the Son of God, King of the Jews, the Word made flesh — don't apply to believers because He hadn’t died yet? That’s not sound doctrine. That’s Scofield-era legalism dressed up as Bible teaching. Hebrews 9:16–17 explains the ratification of the New Covenant...

The New Covenant isn’t based on when the Gospels were written — it’s based on when Jesus shed His blood and rose from the dead. He is the testator, the mediator, and the King — and His words before the Cross are just as binding as after. You’re repeating the Scofield lie that Christ’s words...

You’re not describing biblical Christianity — you’re describing a repackaged form of dispensationalism that splits the Body of Christ in two, glorifies ethnic Israel apart from Jesus, and teaches two returns of Christ when scripture only speaks of one. You’ve turned the New Covenant into a...

The year 2098 - “All you need is a seashell in your pocket and God will take care of the rest!” ^ That’s exactly where this squishy, plastic “grace-only” mindset leads over the next century— straight to a New Age-flavored, judgment-free, fake gospel that strips the cross of its cost and the...

Just say you can't defend your position with Scripture.. Be honest.. Its easier..

Who am I? I’m someone who believes Jesus Christ is the only Name under heaven by which anyone can be saved — Jew or Gentile. (Acts 4:12) And I believe Paul meant what he said when he declared: “If they do not continue in unbelief, they will be grafted in.” (Romans 11:23) IF. Not “when.” Not...

You dare accuse me of being "anti-Semitic" for quoting the King of the Jews? That just shows how lost you truly are. You’ve fallen so deep into Scofield’s delusion, you can’t even tell the difference between rebuke and hatred — between truth and idolatry. I’m not anti-Semitic. I’m...