Search results

Yes, I agree — not everyone is given eyes to see. But here’s the irony: you’re using that truth to justify blindness, not expose it. You're responding to an image and a critique about Scofieldism and political Zionism, but instead of addressing the issue directly, you defaulted to vague...

Revelation 20 lays it out with zero ambiguity: “The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.” — Rev 20:5 “Then I saw a great white throne and Him who was seated on it… and the dead were judged…” — Rev 20:11–13 There is no wiggle room here. No hidden clause. No...

Respectfully, your interpretation twists a straightforward passage into theological origami. Revelation 20:4–6 clearly outlines a sequence: Those who refused the Beast and the Mark are martyred. They are resurrected (not symbolically “lived” — it’s explicitly called the first resurrection)...

You're misusing Hebrews 9:17 to push a dangerous false dichotomy — as if everything Jesus said before the Cross belongs to a “different gospel” than what the Church should follow. Yes, a testament is ratified by death — and Jesus' death sealed the New Covenant in His blood — but He wasn’t...

The Scofield Dispensationalists are so misled & brainwashed, that they can’t even see the forest for the trees. They’re out here speaking complete horse apples 24/7 — as if they’ve got some divine decoder ring from 1909 that overrides the red letters of Jesus Christ Himself. If the Bible were...

Let’s walk this through with the text itself — no gymnastics, no interpolation theories. Revelation 20:4 clearly says “I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded… who had not worshiped the beast… had not received the mark…” — this places the scene after the tribulation. Why? Because the...

WAKE UP people. We are living in the most absurd, upside-down, spiritually hijacked era in human history. The modern State of Rothschild’s False Israel™ — the darling of Dispensationalists, the so-called “prophetic fulfillment,” the supposed home of “God’s chosen people” — is an absolute fraud...

No — I’m not redefining Israel. Paul is. You’re clinging to a flesh-based definition that Paul repeatedly dismantles. Let’s walk through it — again — slowly. “Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel.” — Romans 9:6 That is a redefinition — directly from Paul’s pen. “A Jew is not...

Let’s walk through this slowly so even Scofield’s ghost can keep up. You quoted Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8 as if that somehow disproves the Church's participation in the New Covenant — when Hebrews explicitly says the New Covenant already began, and you're reading it like it’s still future...

You’re twisting Hebrews 9 to say something it absolutely does not say. Yes — a testament is ratified by death. But that doesn’t mean everything Jesus said before the Cross is Old Covenant theology, or that the Gospels are somehow irrelevant to the Church. That’s not exegesis — that’s...

To the lurkers who don’t really know what’s going on here — let me explain it like this: Remember those “Choose Your Own Adventure” books from when you were a kid? “You finally reach the dragon’s cave. To enter, turn to page 34. To run away, turn to page 56.” That’s basically how the Scofield...

You keep dodging Scripture by lobbing insults and projection. That’s not theology — that’s deflection. You still haven’t answered 1 Corinthians 15:23 or 1 Thessalonians 4:15–16 — because you can’t. There’s no seven-year gap. No split resurrections. No “tribulation leftovers.” Just one return...

You just listed a bunch of vague claims with no exegesis, no verses, and no coherence. That’s not Bible study — that’s a temper tantrum. Meanwhile, I gave you 1 Corinthians 15:23 and 1 Thessalonians 4:15–16, which clearly say: “Each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at His coming...

You mean these guys? Yes, I see these demons on the TV all the time.

You're confusing your system with Scripture. Revelation 14:14 doesn’t support your timeline — and it certainly doesn’t describe a “Jewish rapture” or a mid-point secret event. The passage is a symbolic picture of final judgment, not a separate event squeezed between two comings. “Behold, a...

You guys can’t even agree on your own theory. One of you says the Jews are defended on earth when Christ returns with His angels (i.e. stays on the ground). The other says Revelation 14 is about Jews being harvested to heaven by Jesus sitting on a cloud. So which is it? Are Jews staying on...

You're conflating poetic comfort with prophetic sequence. 1 Thessalonians 4 does not describe a separate, secret “first return” — it describes the return of Christ, period. Paul uses apocalyptic language: “The Lord Himself will descend... with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with...

Respectfully, you’re not describing the Gospel — you’re parroting Scofield. The Bible never says Christ is coming twice for two separate groups. There’s no “secret rapture” followed by a later return. That idea is absent from church history before the 1800s and has to be imported into the text...

You guys are splitting hairs over something the text already answers. Let’s stick to what is written in 1 Corinthians 15: “But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at His coming, those who belong to Him.” (1 Cor 15:23) No mention of multiple comings. No secret raptures. No...

This entire deception — this 77-year charade — is no different than the current “trans” delusion. If 500 Japanese citizens “convert” to Judaism — fine. But don’t expect me to start calling them “ethnic descendants of Abraham” or “God’s chosen people” just because they adopted a religion...