Search results

Ephesians 2:10-13 declares, “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the...

I've never used the term new Israel in my life. That is your invented term. I've told you and showed you that we are the Israel of God today. You have no rebuttal for that. You have to invent terms to try and justify your error.

I just showed you explicit Scripture. You are incapable of exegeting Scripture or rebutting counter-arguments. Until you do, it is pointless engaging with you. There is no depth to your posts. All i see is fly-by personal opinions. There are no scriptural arguments to refute. All I am seeing is...

You have already fudged it. It demolishes what you have been taught.

You need to see that there is a natural seed and a spiritual seed. The natural seed have one birth. The spiritual seed has two births. The first seed is from below. The second seed is from above. One is carnal and the other belongs to God. The Apostles declares in Romans 2:25-29: “For...

You have double vision. There is only 1 people of God. Jesus told His Jewish disciples in John 10:14-16 that there were “other sheep … which are not of this fold” which would be brought into His fold and they would “be one fold, and one shepherd,” talking about the NT overwhelmingly Gentile...

You have no rebuttals to the truth, just evasive chides. Every single argument on this thread has been avoided by you. I wonder why? Address the biblical arguments. Is this too much to ask? After all, this is a Bible discussion forum.

More avoidance. That is all you have here. You cannot address the numerous holes in what you have been taught.

Jesus says there is now "one fold, and one shepherd" whereas you promote two folds. Sorry, I go with Jesus on this (once again) not Dispensensationalism! No one (apart from someone who has been totally indoctrinated) could surely dispute the fact we are looking at an Israeli tree in Romans 11...

No. Fact!

No. Dispensatanists argue that. But they are wrong. That have nothing to support their error.

Jacob’s troubles relates to Jeremiah's day. It is long gone.

You promote a doctrine that has zero corroboration. That is why Premils run when they are pressed on biblical support for their theory. I will put your beliefs to the test once more so the reader can see what many of us can: What Scripture, if any, do you consider definitely corroborates the...

You have nothing. That is the story of this thread. All you have is extra-biblical speculations.

That does not say Jacob's trouble. Where in Matthew 24 does it mention Jacobs trouble?

Exactly. You cannot support what you have been taught with hard Scripture. We already knew that.

Where does he mention Jacobs trouble? Where does the NT mention Jacobs trouble?

More avoidance. That seems to be your MO.

Ephesians 3:1-9: “For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to youward: How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, Whereby, when ye read, ye may...

You promote a doctrine that has zero corroboration. That is why Premils run when they are pressed on biblical support for their theory. I will put your beliefs to the test once more so the reader can see what many of us can: What Scripture, if any, do you consider definitely corroborates the...