Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    thou shalt not have any graven images.
  2. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    No, he called Jesus his lord, and God his God. There is a repetition of mou meaning "mine/my" in the Greek. You interpretation couldn't be any more lame.
  3. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    God is such a fluid substance in your mind.
  4. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    Jack would say he gave it to himself. Who do you say he is?
  5. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    I am not the one who twisted John 20:28.
  6. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    The JWs don't know Koine Greek. It is the general consensus.
  7. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    You know anything about it. It has been going on for 2000 years. It didn't start with English under Tyndale.
  8. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    See above. And since you don't know Greek...?
  9. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    It was an analogy, because truly retarded humans don't understand the trinity or Calvinism. A nonproof. Ha Ha Ha. It would be morelike, my lord and God or my God lord. "ὁ κύριός μου καὶ ὁ θεός μου" it does not convey. Notice the doubling of mou . Also, the Greek kai is not conducive to gluing...
  10. M

    Is it possible to lose salvation?

    They don't believe the bible much in Rome. There was no separation of Elder and Bishop under the first system. Rome is not 2000 years old, the Roman Church began with the great schism and invented many new heresies. Rome does not believe in oral tradition, because it writes down its rules in...
  11. M

    Is it possible to lose salvation?

    Moreover, what are our wrongdeeds, since humanity is full of sin.
  12. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    In your delusions perhaps. There are many which put the father and holy ghost together but separate the son from the father. Perhaps, it is easier for the mentally retarded to believe in Greek gods, but they are confused by the trinity concept.
  13. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    Their human idols were thought to be made in the appearance of YHWH.
  14. M

    Is it possible to lose salvation?

    Rome has this problem.
  15. M

    Is it possible to lose salvation?

    Rather they didn't live or prosper on this sin.
  16. M

    Is it possible to lose salvation?

    τὰ γὰρ ὀψώνια τῆς ἁμαρτίας θάνατος Because some wages of a sin death. Thanatos is the deprivation of life and prosperity. It is not nekros, i.e. decaying life. ἁμαρτίας is nominative singular feminine. Sin in translated a plural which is the biggest error. And he wasn't in the garden?
  17. M

    Is it possible to lose salvation?

    Debt of our wrongdoings or sin. God always promises to fix what Satan breaks.
  18. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    But not the obsession with death. This has nothing to do with the real Samaritans of the biblical narrative and of the 1st century who used human models to worship YHWH.
  19. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    Whatever. You have only one verse which puts all 3 together in 3 names.
  20. M

    Is the New World Translation a valid version of the Bible?

    So, the Samaritans believed their human statues were YHWH. How is this different than the trinity?