Search results

It certainly is parallel. That's why Matthew and Luke (and Mark) are known as the Synoptic Gospels. Confirmed for me, and for every recognizant Child of God, at Calvary 2,000 years ago. Sorry about you.

What hallucinogen are you ingesting? :D Link to a post in which I've said "that the 144k can not possibly be Jewish." The Church has welcomed multitudes of Jewish Christians since its birth. All that winking will damage your eyes.

When an ethnic/genetic Jew receives Christ, his ethnicity before he receives Christ is unchanged after he receives Christ. Nothing ethnic/genetic is replaced. "Replacement theology" is simply another risible contrived dispensational fallacy.

The parallel Scripture in Luke identifies the abomination of desolation: Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. It was the Roman armies. Nothing to do with "end of days". Luke was neither disingenuous nor mistaken...

Strictly dispensational "interpretation by imagination". Daniel 11 was fulfilled long ago in the Seleucid empire. It is entirely unrelated to Daniel 9. The vile person was Antiochus Epiphanes IV. He knew how to use flattery way back then. We're discussing Daniel 9:24-27. Try to stay on...

All opinion, no Scripture. 1 Corinthians 2:14 Can you do better?

He's had me on "ignore" for a long time, but if you wouldn't mind, ask him what "replacement theology" is, given that the Church does not ethnically/genetically replace Israel. Appreciated. He's completely immersed in the racist "replacement biology" which is the foundation of dispensationalism.

The word "antichrist" does not exist in OT Hebrew or Aramaic. A nonexistent antichrist cannot confirm anything. In addition, "antichrist" is invalidated grammatically. The grammatical antecedent/referent of "he" in Daniel 9:27 is "prince" in Daniel 9:26. The grammatical antecedent/referent of...

Who do you think Daniel's "covenant with many" (Daniel 9:27) refers to?

It's listed as a characteristic, so it must have significance. What do you think is its significance?

So you believe that God will choose 144,000 sex-deprived Israelites. Is that the criterion for His choice?

Please post the Scriptural reference that describes God's faithful obedient saints through the ages as "pesky". No gymnastics at all for the spiritually discerning. Foolishness to all others. 1 Corinthians 2:14 Thank you God for the records of your faithful obedient saints through the ages...

Have you heard of Calvary? Matthew 26:28 for this is My blood of the covenant, which is being poured out for many for forgiveness of sins. 1 Corinthians 11:25 In the same way He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood; do this, as often as you drink...

The dispensational problem is its refusal to recognize that there are two different and separate "they's", i.e. two different Israels, in Romans 11:28. The first "they" are those who are enemies because of the Gospel. The second "they" are the beloved elect(ion), of grace (Romans 11:1-5)...

Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...

There is no "coming 70th". The 70th came immediately after the 69th almost 2,000 years ago.

There is no "the Antichrist" in Scripture. 1 John 2 18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. There were many antichrists when John wrote, and after he wrote, and will...

Utter incoherent nonsense. The promises were and are to Abraham, Christ, and those in Christ. There is no "Israel" to be seen. Genesis 12 1 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee: 2...

It is a more-than-satisfactory answer for every recognized historical defender of the true faith up to the 19th century.

Where the seven Churches are mentioned, the messages are for each of those seven Churches specifically. Where the Saints are mentioned, the messages are for all Saints, which includes all Churches everywhere. And the Saints are present throughout the majority of the chapters in the remainder...